Jump to content

Jerome

Members
  • Posts

    278
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Jerome

  1. Ofc he did Lewis a bum. what’s happenin
  2. No form of rape, pedophilia or child pornography should be allowed under any circumstance imo.
  3. This has to be a joke. You expect the GTA V version of the LAPD to maintain an unarmed police force. This isn’t the UK buddy. They’re imitating the LAPD on a map that is supposed to be Los Angeles.
  4. Well you're free to write reports. They exist obviously, however you aren't forced to do them. There are some divisional requirements for specific fields internally where you're required to do forum work such as the detective section, field training officers and any other role under the administrative side of the faction.
  5. Doesn't opening applications early defeat the purpose of patreons donating for this feature?
  6. Jerome

    UFC Discussions

    Also khabib is not a goat at all and won’t ever be considered one
  7. Jerome

    UFC Discussions

    Finally somebody summed it up perfectly although the only fight I personally think he lost was to Dominick Reyes
  8. It happened sometime before the server closed actually, I was gonna arrest the guy myself. He ended up being arrested by another detective. Forget his name, think it started with a P though. Either way, if it's an issue that's been fixed and a plan to prevent such from happening again has been implemented, good.
  9. I don’t want to derail the topic anymore than it already has been, I’ll DM you to talk about it one on one.
  10. All due respect, it doesn’t matter what you’d appreciate. The topic never said feedback had to be specifically from illegal roleplayers nor based on any one thing. These things I mentioned affected my roleplay and my experience on this server. Our roleplay as law enforcement has an impact on everyone not just illegal roleplayers, everyone including the very people who want to move up in these factions. If you weren’t appreciative of the feedback, don’t respond to it. My feedback was focused on what was done wrong, and I gave an example why. I clearly said I would like to see the leadership team accept criticism and not label it as slanderous because they don’t agree with it. I also said members of the team need to be strong minded and have opinions of their own rather than piggy back off of the next man like they did about a year or two ago. The issue I had with the injunctions was discussed in the gang talk discord, it was about the repetitive take down on gangs such as the one that was located in Washington street at one point where they were I personally witnessed them being raised 4 times in one day for allegedly violating a gang injunction by sitting outside on their gated off porches. The gang enforcement leadership and judges at the time did not understand how this should have been enforced and purposely allowed their gang units to misinterpret the section of the injunction that said they could not gather in public view as literal and started arresting them merely for being in private property not doing anything illegal.
  11. The obvious reasons being the problem we had with people in the governments licensing section driving around in premiers and armor pretending to be detectives on SAMP. Also, the police department should handle firearm licensing, realistically speaking. They’re the ones that do extensive background checks, revoke violators ig (violators usually caught by cops) and so forth.
  12. There's a difference between not agreeing with criticism and labeling criticism as slandering your faction. I voiced my opinion about the negative impact the PD's gang unit was having on the gangs through it's excessive abuse and poorly executed enforcement of gang injunctions on a live stream and was ousted for it. Gangs were shutting down and people were leaving over it. The stream barely had 3 viewers other than the PD command unit who was watching it to eavesdrop on the conversation myself and a few others were having in a private channel. I said nothing of any toxic nature and nothing I said could be repeated because there was nothing toxic said and 2, there was no recording. The situation was spun to make it seem like I was publicly shaming the PD on a live stream & rushed to delete the video when I wasn't the one streaming, wasn't aware there was a live stream and I never said anything wrong. I didn't even get a chance to give my side of the story because everyone at the time was Gibbz's yes men. Another thing is the strict prohibition of other faction members joining your channels on Teamspeak. Policies like that don't encourage "stronger roleplay," they just attack the people who are friends but in different factions that want to chat it up while roleplaying. Unless there's some actual harm like people joining unauthorized channels like your TAC and so forth, I don't see why a PD unit who is on duty can't go to a channel with a SD unit who is on duty to talk about things outside of roleplay to make their time on the game enjoyable. I'm not taking a jab at anyone, all of that is behind us now but I am championing for things of this nature to not become a thing on the GTA V server. It creates a toxic environment for all parties involved and nobody wants to play at that point. We should be encouraging people to talk to one another and make friends and we should be encouraging criticism on all levels, whether it's related to roleplay, conduct or anything else.
  13. Are they moving the application system for firearm licenses to government? I hope not, and I hope the LSPD continues to handle firearm licenses for obvious reasons.
  14. As mentioned above, that type of culture is not permitted within the SD. While we try to be as realistic as possible, everybody understands it's a game and we don't try to make it anything except that. We won't have people doing reports for 2+ hours like if they're in a law enforcement job in real life, and we definitely don't pressure people to roleplay how we want. The idea of trying to roleplay 1:1 with the LASD has always been stupid IMO and never gets anywhere. The LAPD/LASD fanboy mindset is just poor and just results in the game no longer being fun.
  15. I disagree. Furniture items should have a limit between non donating players and those with donator status. Say the limit for items is 25 for free players, and 35-45-55 between the three tier levels. Shouldn't be an issue. The issue at hand isn't "I shouldn't have to donate irl money to blah blah," but the issue is finding a non play to win way of rewarding people who donate and help keep the bills paid. Server don't run for free and management shouldn't have to pay for it out of pocket. Vehicles themselves shouldn't be restricted to any donators. Clothing items shouldn't be restricted but the different slots (if this will be a thing) for outfits should definitely be limited. 4 slots for non donators, and raise it depending on the donator tier. Name changes, custom license plates, custom phone numbers etc should continue to be a donator perk as well. Not anyone's fault you can't donate and I personally don't think being able to donate for the above mentioned things promotes a pay to win mentality. Donators should be rewarded for donating, it's just that simple.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.