Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/30/2024 in all areas

  1. Tres Ocho's Homegirls Drug Distribution Ring
    4 points
  2. BBC ft. PDC Collaboration Tee / Playa Deville Slides For Lee Carson
    3 points
  3. Appreciate this thread, keep going fellas
    2 points
  4. Flynn Doherty's Journal Sep 28th 2024 How could I be so stupid... As soon as I was moving an AK, fucking cops drove by. Biggest mistake of me life other than the ridicule I did to my kids to drive them away. Where do I go from here? How will this affect ACE. FUCKING TWAT YOU ARE DOHERTY! You've built so much, for what? To make a fucking dumb move like this? I can just sit with my thoughts, drive me fucking mad they will. Maybe I can squeeze something... Something to get rid of this bull shit charge. All I can do is pray things don't go down the gutter... Flynn Doherty Asst Director A.C.E. Los Santos Capital Group
    2 points
  5. Brand Talk: Not Her, But She's Got You / Connection Secured
    2 points
  6. what does arditi plan on the other side of the town? man of mischief and great capability. Keep it up!
    2 points
  7. 1 point
  8. finest psychopath lsrp ever seen
    1 point
  9. Your honour, Plaintiff makes very moving points and I would fall for it myself if I didn't know better, but he's confusing the timeline and ultimately arguing points that we've already discredited in this very court room. Plaintiff's argument one alleges that Stefan Castillo was in custodial interrogation and therefore required his Miranda rights to be read. Mr. Castillo was not, at any time, part of any criminal investigation by the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department and thus his Miranda rights were not required to be read. It is true that Mr. Castillo was in an interrogation - although not custodial - related to his performance as a sheriff's deputy within the Department and thus - and rightly so - was given a Garrity warning. Plaintiff's argument that Captain Guanti "feeling" that he was not free to leave does not make it custodial. The fact that he is a "seasoned Captain" is irrelevant. His mere feeling is lay testimony - the personal experience of Captain Guanti is not reflective of Internal Affairs Bureau procedures. Captain Guanti, being a "seasoned Captain" himself however, does know what a performance interview is. Nobody is required by law to attend - of course they should if they want to keep their job - but at no point was Mr. Castillo ever in custody. Your honour, in my personal experience I feel like I'm not free to leave when my mother in law wants me for Christmas, and dare I say no reasonable person believes they would be able to leave either - does that make it custodial by any meaning of the word? Stefan Castillo - and you can check the transcripts, your honour - Stefan Castillo never once asked to leave the interrogation. In fact, Mr. Castillo was told in plain English that the interview was regarding his performance and this makes it clear that the interview was just that - a performance review, and not custodial detention. Miranda does establish that a reasonable person should feel that their freedom of action is deprived in a significant way. No reasonable person thinks that they are not legally free to walk right out the door when in a performance-based interview. Plaintiff argues in their argument two that Mr. Castillo was discriminated against for being a law enforcement officer and that his rights were somehow lessened during this so-called "custodial interview". Defense maintains that this was demonstrably not a custodial interview and was, in fact, a performance review. This is further backed up by the fact that Mr. Castillo was given his Garrity warning before the interview - and he had signed it, alongside Captain Guanti - and was well aware of his rights. Mr. Castillo is well aware of how a use of force investigation goes, given that he has himself placed his subordinates on administrative leave for the same thing he was placed on administrative leave for. Which, if it pleases the court, we can back up with administrative records from the Department. Mr. Castillo knows that this is not a custodial interrogation, being the seasoned deputy that he is - or was. The Plaintiff's argument three that defense has made this trial an obstacle from the start is also a gross obfuscation of the facts. Defense has readily provided all documents, volunteering documents even at the very beginning of this case, because it stands behind its sequence of decisions regarding Mr. Castillo. (( @Kotwica, @Fabi ))
    1 point
  10. me and all the homies hate lalo
    1 point
  11. 1 point
  12. 1 point
  13. PDC 2.0: Social Strategies / Marketing for the Streets
    1 point
  14. 1 point
  15. PDC's Expansion: Beyond the Horizon / Power Talks
    1 point
  16. 1 point
  17. Playa Deville Young Initiatives
    1 point
  18. Plugs all around Los Santos. How much you need. Never a drought.
    1 point
  19. New Era / The Playa Deville Empire
    1 point
  20. | ((OOC INFORMATION)) ((This faction is based on realistic criminal roleplay, focused on organized crime and smuggling. Our aim is to create immersive stories that reflect the complexity of leading an underground organization. We welcome European and Baltic characters with well-thought-out backgrounds and a commitment to quality roleplay.))
    1 point
  21. Elevating the Game: Laila’s PDC Path
    1 point
  22. Rondell Henry a/k/a C-Fury#4 / The Playa Deville Vision
    1 point
  23. From the Ground Up — Real Talk on Our Brand / Strategy Sessions
    1 point
  24. @Korpse about time no?
    1 point
  25. Playa Deville Meals Chef — Don't Let Me Down
    1 point
  26. New Ventures — Introducing Laila to the PDI Vision
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.