JesterJr

I'm just replying back to you in the same constructive way that you are. I'm sorry if you feel it as toxic, wasn't my intention. I'll work better on it. However, am I allowed to disagree with you, or not?

Don't forget to drop a follow, as well.

Gimme a break, I didn't hide some that were proper, like my fanboy showing support. But seriously if you're banned and you're so proud for it, why you bother? That's a genuine question.

Oh hey, that's me. 👋🏼 Hello my fan. Drop a follow, like and subscribe boi. www.twitch.tv/jesterjr1337

Hmm.. ok.

Toxic? Why? Replying back the way you communicate something and it's toxic? It's just how life works. Let's not pull a victim card here, I'm not replying to you as a staff member. But people who talk like you or others who decided to think they can bully their way around, is not fun anymore. As for the removal of a staff member, he can appeal it instead of going on DM sprees. And thinking I'm the decline, maybe I am, but I've been enforcing most of the things you all talk here, and also tried to push the same agenda into staff discussions. But you're ungrateful at this point, and you just shoot someone just because they have the green name. Which is why I'm trying to prove you that your attitude is the toxic one and not the fact that I reply back to you the same way you talk. We're all on the same boat. You just don't understand it and you read only portions of what you want just to post how bad staff team is and point a finger to someone.

I'll do my best to vociec your constructive criticism in the future meet ups. I'm sorry if it wasn't forwarded properly.

If you think the way you said it is ok, you have serious issues.

If you think the way you said it is ok, you have serious issues.

The person who is affected by it, can appeal. But the same person decided to go on DM sprees like a little immature kid, proving the action worthy. Idk why they need lawyers.

You talk about homophobic, half assed, hateful and racist comments? That's bright.

You expect professionalism and quick reactions from the staff, but you're stuck saying the same things over and over again. If you don't want to be replied the way you talk, don't post then. In other words, don't talk the talk if you can't walk the walk. You post hate, get warned and you just talk about censorship. Sometimes, you really should watch in the mirror. Staff is already doing it's part, as I said, things don't happen in 5 minute span from your hate post.

You seem to misunderstand stating your opinion publicly and being a human being. Chill boys. I'm pretty sure you can properly set up a discussion instead of talking about 40 y/o homosexuals and just recycling how you disagree with management, and expect a change within 5 minutes from your massive post of saying how bad staff is. Look at yourself in the mirror sometime.

I fully feel you Michael. And discussions are there to make things better. I just hope more people read through them to educate instead of thinking it's a few people yapping on a "dead game" or fuck all lsrp cause some people in the past were idiots.

I get your idea, I agree with you. The dismissive and superior attitude that you'd do everything much better is what makes me want to defend it, but it's easy to just judge, and also makes the distance bigger. So I won't. All I can do is pretty much take your opinion and use it in the future if it happens, maybe share the mindset as much as I can. Although it'll change nothing, to be honest. Because again, there will be one thing that someone won't like and complain again, point a finger to the staff and the hiatus between them and on and on.

But this is just a specific case. You are nitpicking. I can stream you my playtime and show you that there are countless situations where we do exactly what you're saying. We just don't walk around to tell you we did it.

Oh so your problem is the reporting party and not the reported party. And the reported party wasn't even bothered by it. You are. You want us to bring back the report and punish the reporting party, without an actual report on them, then?

I didn't read your first post that you are trying to backup, because I'm not home right now. But since you decide to go case by case, I'll answer to you the same way, in hope that you won't think I'm going aggressive on you, but to give you the server administration side of things. N0de states clearly in his first sentence "Given your clean admin record, I'll just be issuing you a warning.". And then he proceeds to explain the player what he did wrong and voided the scene. Not every situation must be concluded with an ajail, a kick or a ban. Admins take under consideration the players record, demeanor throughout a report and at some cases how long it was since their last admin punishment. Also in cases, we add those warnings as notes to players whereas an admin later on can see that the player has been warned. In the case of the report you try to somewhat bash the current Staff, the player is brand new, and they were corrected without a punishment this time around. Don't take me wrong, but not giving someone a chance to keep their admin record clean is as unfair as the way you are using this "amazing example", which in my eyes is good administration move from n0de. However, there are cases where players been around messing around for way too long and left unpunished. This is not something that is going lightly anymore, at least from the admins I know around.

Congratulations to all the winners! Nice to see, more to come!

If you have nothing fruitful or on topic to say, skip this thread. This ain't your playground.

However, I understand what you're saying, but there's no actual solution at hand I can just pull out of my pocket to be frank with you, as a Game Admin. All I can do is take your word and at the first chance I get, provide it to a discussion where Staff is needed to put their input. My job is merely to push your word into our Management & try to point them at the direction our community shows. Which I actually appreciate, especially when the way you reply is actually not "fuck you all, this is the right way". I understand that the problem here is the line between Management → Players Feedback. Maybe at this point, some of us from the staff team are at fault too, because Management has tried to get our opinion for areas of improvement, but I don't think anyone has asked you an open question like that from our side here. All I can tell is not a promise, but the fact that our leadership seems to be trying to provide what the community wants. Maybe attempt to get back some factions too, or players who lost their faith. I have also been through a moment where I lost my faith towards the leadership, but to be honest, the server is based on its players and not the leadership per se. That's a very bad attempt to distract and derail the discussion I'm trying to provide here. Two admins who got banned is history, it happened - you can move on instead of recycling the story, it provides nothing but negativity. As for the Senior Admin allegations, as far as I'm aware it's a thing under investigation. The reason this thread got active again is because there's few of us actually trying to get feedback so we can push it to the appropriate channels. Passive aggressive comments like the one you made, are immature and provide literally nothing but negativity & you try to catch a reaction so you can point your finger again. His first statement was vague, his second attempt was on point. I listed some of the current leadership, who might even need to read this. I will agree with the structure, plan and priorities. Which is something they are trying to fix, I hope not when it's already super late. What many players do not understand, is that we are on the same boat. We're all people who want the server to keep having players in for us to play. We're all people who want factions to have interactions with. It's not that some people sit in a hollow mountain, conspiring how to make things worse and hard. Regardless if your forum name is white, green or whatever, we all play on LSRP in the end of the day.

That's also another vague statement, I'm afraid. "Bad Management"? You're literally calling out @jack, @izumi, @Dos Santos, @bobster, @Helius & @badhbh, who have been delivering almost everything that was requested by the community. What I'm aware and I've stated in countless discussions, is that LSRP has a problem in delivering solutions fast. Which is a big flaw. Unless by "bad management" you want to point the finger to someone specific. If communicated properly, I think no one will feel threatened by your statement to bring things in a better face. Waving the hand of "there's no coming back", brings no solutions. And you are the thread holder of an Official Illegal Faction, which is also active. It's concerning if you make such comments publicly, and I'm willing to listen.

This server has been around for way too long to "not deserve" something, and many people have devoted a lot of their time, including factions, individual players & staff. Because there were bad apples, you can't really put the whole group in the same sack, it's really unfair. I'm pretty sure LSRP is aware that huge mistakes were made in the past, but right now (ever since SAMP returned) working to get this back. If factions feel, they are always welcome to return and continue what they were doing. The server has enough room, both script-wise and map-wise to hold as many factions as they want to. And communication is a key, if factions should return, they should do so by properly communicating their problems. I'm willing to really help anyone with that and work as their guide back to adapt. Just give the needs and we'll do our best.

Yep, we're saying pretty much the same thing. Of course I do not mean that Legal Factions should have the full power to just do those things. Legal Factions however should be encouraged to chase down illegal entities. Build casefiles and once they feel it's ready to be executed, forward that casefile to a selective few Judges, who can be Faction Management members & interested players. A group of people, who will impartially take the decision whether the casefile is clean or not to be executed. If not, it should be pushed back and rejected IC by the DA. The casefile to be completed, must have the final signatures & approvals by: (From lower to higher) Lead Detective → Detective Unit Director → Sheriff / Chief of Police (Depending the agency) → DAs (IFC) & Governor of LS (A Lead Admin or a player who earned this spot) If one of them find something foul, casefile should undergo evaluation and go all over. What I state above, is a very simplified filter, to avoid all the problems you called out for. The point is to choose people who have no gain out of it, other than giving a clean answer. You cannot trust IFC at this point to take an impartial conclusion, with all due respect, but we're all human beings. Two out of the three IFC members are leaders of official illegal factions. I won't have spectre or Klag to evaluate the casefile I'll build on their faction. Imagine if you actually have cops on your ass - on a proper way. Imagine if you're scared to do reckless stuff and how many things will be fixed on our quality. Having competitive PD / SD Detective & Crime Suppression units brings competition with the illegal side. Competition brings commitment. Commitment brings quality. Quality brings better RP. Better RP brings a good community renewal. And I say again @Michael_Dippolito, we're saying the same thing, I do not contest your opinion. On the other hand, I appreciate that you brought it up so I can also clear up my side. I never meant that PD / SD should have the power on their own to shut down factions. But give them the opportunity to do something, and if the illegal faction is reckless enough or if the case is going for 2-3 years of constant updates, the legal faction to create suppressive stakeouts & takedowns. For example a business closure, a shotcaller arrest (if they have enough evidence) - which could also bring great prison RP as they should go there and run their group from the prison, a crew takedown etc etc. Imagine if you had to use realism to your actions, because there are repercussions if you're seen by a cop or a bystander who reports you to the Police. That will increase our quality & activity as a whole! @Beda What you stated is tackled by correct administration and transparency between teams. It also is fixed by both legal & illegal sides accepting an L. 🙂

I've read through the comments... Do you realize that all these rules just ruin the fun? You can avoid situations like D'Aquila if IFM properly goes through the acquired evidence. What are we? 10 year olds? Having cops actually being able to act on illegal factions, brings competition. Competition brings commitment and commitment brings activity and PB. I ran an illegal MC for 6 years. An official faction. And I had no pressure from cops at ALL. I could do anything I wanted, literally. No repercussions. That's what you want? I find it petty if you give me as an excuse that an incompetent IFM allowed some insufficient evidence to shut down D'Aquila as a reason that organized crime detectives can't build casefiles in 2024.