Jump to content

Sparkles

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,312

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Sparkles

    [Discussions / Questions] San Andreas Penal Code

    in Laws & Acts of San Andreas

    Posted

    2 hours ago, Userone said:

    Yes, but it doesn’t say “sexual misconduct,” does it now? No, it doesn’t.

     

    The way its written now, “sexually suggestive” could imply flirting. Thus, because consensual, non-disruptive and non-harassment flirting is a right protected under first amendment, this needs to be fixed.

    I think you're reading way too much into it, honestly.

    What would bring you back into LSRP?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    On 12/27/2023 at 7:30 AM, Cursed_King said:

    2- Visual marketing like videos to be pushed on social media with tags.

    3- Spread the word out by showcasing the new features in forum posts and in videos that will be posted in YT channel.

    These are actively being worked on. All new features will have Feature Documentation videos/documents at launch

    • Strong 1

    What would bring you back into LSRP?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, Scheming said:

    If I was to be mag dumping. What's stopping me from replenishing more ammo after said criminal is dead at the back of my trunk or at the station?

    Nothing, but having a limit will help combat some of the complaints about the cops and robbers type feel that's carried over from SAMP. Forcing replenishing, having a limit on the amount that can be stored, etc. 

     

     

    8 minutes ago, Scheming said:

    Shoutout whoever made this. A UCP map on places to stay at should definitely be scripted when the PB kicks up and people are hopefully, struggling to find a place to buy!

    I definitely agree to a UCP map or IG app on being able to find places for rent or buy. 

    Also at some point the complexes will be getting a custom apartment interior per complex, but that's a project that's going to take a bit of time with how small the mapping team is and with other projects ongoing.

    What would bring you back into LSRP?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    1 hour ago, BillyTheKid said:

    My buddies and I were dedicated members who would create tons of RP for the community, both on the legal/illegal sides, and I felt like I only heard from staff members whenever we were in trouble. If we presented an idea or asked for something (realistic requests) that would enhance the RP experience for the community then we would simply get ignored 10 out of 10 times. Unless the staff member was a personal friend. I would like to think that I was one of the more creative members who had only one goal in mind, to create more RP for others, and some of my ideas were cool af but they were all ignored or shut down. This resulted with us roleplaying in our own little corner of the server.

     

    So yeah. I would like to see some cooperation from staff when it comes to factions/businesses rather than working against them. In my honest opinion, they should be top priority seeing as they are the ones who bring the actual RP and scenarios to the server and its members.

    Can you give some examples of things needed from staff?

    What would bring you back into LSRP?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    31 minutes ago, livid said:

    To follow up - let's remove the level three (3) limitation on being able to equip weapons, shall we? I believe it's absolutely unnecessary and it plays a key role in illegal roleplay demotivation of starting a new character. I know you're gonna say "Make 'em earn it!" but why should we make anyone earn anything? Everything should be laid out and the roleplayer should be able to express themselves in any way they deem fit. If it crosses the line and becomes rule breaking, they'll be reprimanded for their actions. Simple. 

    I believe this is across accounts not per character. To keep newbies from joining and immediately be DMers which we did have a problem with for a short bit.

     

    31 minutes ago, livid said:

    Promoting the server would do wonders - on any social media. This should be put as a number one priority and a trailer would be awesome. If the team needs any help creating it, I'm sure the player-base would be more than happy to participate; both the illegal and legal side of roleplay.  

    Trailer is being worked on, and comms team is open to non-staff 🙂

    32 minutes ago, livid said:

    Thirdly, there are no additional features that premium could have that it doesn't already so that people would be hooked onto buying it. The only thing I can think of is receiving a bundle of three (3) name-changes in it and one (1) custom license plate and custom number across all of your characters. This would make premium worth it and there would be more people buying this so that they can receive these benefits in bulk - rather than paying for it individually each and every single time. 

    I definitely agree that premium could be reworked. That's why it was included in the December survey

    What's missing from the server?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    3 hours ago, SausageFruit said:

    I fully agree to all the comments that were mentioned above, but what I firstly want to see is a "finger pointing" script and secondly, a script-option to be able to adjust your position while you are in an animation. Those are right now the most important ones that I see missing. They might just seem like little details, but everybody would be glad to use the script ability after all.

    Both of those are approved suggestions 

    • Strong 1

    [23B-013] People v. Gabriel Medina

    in Criminal Division

    Posted

    **Theodore Lozano stands to give his closing statement**

    "Your honor, your duty in this courtroom is to seek justice. The evidence presented in this case paints a clear picture of a disturbing incident that occurred on October 16th, involving the defendant, Gabriel Medina, who was serving as a Patrol Deputy of the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department out of the Davis station starting in August.

    The People have meticulously outlined the events that transpired during a so-called routine traffic stop, events that escalated into a violation of Mr. Leonardo Cordero's rights and a clear violation of the public's trust. The actions of Mr. Medina, as detailed in the witness testimony and supported by the dashcam evidence, demonstrate a disregard for proper law enforcement procedures and a willingness to use excessive force.

    Mr. Cordero, our victim, has bravely stepped forward to recount the events of that day, revealing a troubling pattern of behavior within the Sheriff's Department. The defendant's role in this incident is not that of a neutral observer, but as an active participant in the assault on Mr. Cordero.

    The Defense has attempted to justify Mr. Medina's actions by citing concerns about alleged gang affiliation and need for officer safety. However, it is crucial to note that our legal system is built on the principles of due process and the protection of individual rights. The actions taken by Mr. Medina and his fellow deputies on that day were not proportionate to the situation, as evidenced by Mr. Cordero's compliance with prior inquiries and his lawful refusal of an unwarranted vehicle search.


    The Defense brought forward a character witness from the Sheriff's Department. However, that witness, by his own answers, barely worked with Mr. Medina. He only had 2-3 incidents of interaction with Mr. Medina, and those were "long ago" - baring in mind that Mr. Medina was only working with this witness from August, at the earliest, until October when Mr. Medina was separated from the department.

    In conclusion, the evidence is clear and compelling. Former Deputy Gabriel Medina, entrusted with upholding the law and protecting the citizens of San Andreas, abused that trust on October 16th. His actions constitute not only a violation of the law, but a betrayal of the principles that guide our justice system. The People urge you to deliver a verdict that reflects a commitment to justice and accountability, holding Mr. Medina responsible for the crimes he has committed.

    Thank you."

    (( @almightybounter @Kotwica ))

    Requestable interiors - What do you want to see?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    On 11/27/2023 at 6:36 PM, Cursed_King said:

    More office interiors

    Old money mansion style interior

    Meth/drug lab trap houses

    Also houses with basements 

    These have been added to the project list for mapping team:
    - 2 offices (for now)

    - 1 old money mansion style

    - 2 meth/drug lab trap houses (1 with basement)

    - 1 regular house with basement

    No ETA, but we will work as we can.

    • Love 1

    Requestable interiors - What do you want to see?

    in General Discussions

    Posted

    A few months ago, the existing mapping team made several custom interiors - https://community.ls-rp.com/forums/topic/7422-available-interiors/?tab=comments#comment-59072 (Custom Apartment #1-#7) & all houses

    I'm also working on a video walkthrough of each of those interiors.

     


    This is something we're looking at again with the current team. What kind of interiors do you want to be able to request?

    [23B-013] People v. Gabriel Medina

    in Criminal Division

    Posted

    ((Reposting this with the ones not being answered for clarity))

     

    **Lozano stands up to ask his questions. He remains standing.**

     

    Q1: Lieutenant, under what rank category is Lieutenant in the Sheriff's Department?

    A1: ANSWER

    Q2: You stated that you supervised "a few vehicle pursuits" with Mr. Medina, and "a few" of his calls. How many times did you, personally, directly supervise Mr. Medina?
    A2:     ANSWER 

    Q3: In your instances of direct supervision with Mr. Medina in the field, did you personally witness any use of force by him? If so, can you describe the circumstances surrounding those incidents?
    A3:     ANSWER

    Q4: You stated that you are not aware of any discussion within the Command Staff team regarding Mr Medina. Are you aware of any formal evaluations or performance reviews conducted for Mr. Medina?
    A4:     ANSWER

    Q5: You mentioned that you're not aware of any reports regarding Mr. Medina. Are there specific channels or procedures within the department for reporting concerns about an officer's conduct, and have you ever been involved in such processes?

    A5: ANSWER

     

    Q6: You stated that, based on Mr. Medina's overall performance, there was nothing to determine him unfit for the department. Can you elaborate on what criteria or standards you use to assess an officer's fitness for duty?

    A6: ANSWER

    Q7: At the time of his arrest and dismissal, how long had Mr. Medina been employed with the department?
    Q7:     ANSWER


    @Kingston AT 

Los Santos Roleplay

Los Santos Roleplay is a text-based heavy roleplay community on GTA, providing gamers a creative space to play since 2007

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.

  I accept