Leaderboard

Eventful night at the Chieftan

😪

The New Wave — Monte's First Lessons / Hustle Fundamentals

On The Line — Crucial Moments / Last Challenge / Ready To Step Up? - for the rest (Tario Moose picked up a urgent call, his phone kept ringing and ringing so he knew something was up. Shortly after the call; The Moose twins went off, supposedly in aid to Yahira Moose, their younger sister.)

.

The Execution II

The News — Official Politics / Playa Deville Club Clothing

The PDC Collection / Inspiring The Hustle

heard these fellas been terrorizing the russians...

All In For The Hustle — Money In Rotation / Hustle Highlights Into The Trap — Setting Up The Drop / Next Pack Ready On The Frontlines — Setting Up The Hustle / Monte's First Drop

Grind Mode — Stocked & Ready / Business Booming

You guys on the negative too. Up ur score🤣

ANOTHER DAY OF HARD WORK

"Firstly, your honor, you mistake what I have said in reference to our well-pleaded complaint under Rule 8(a). I have stated that this particular evidence is not a necessity at this point because it is not integral to discovery of evidence relevant to the facts of this case. We say this in order to inform the court that it need not wait for this evidence, because we have demonstrated that our client is entitled to a trial in this matter even if there is evidence still pending. Furthermore, this evidence is needed only to substantiate the award amount and a hearing can be held at the conclusion of trial if liability is found by this court. Secondly, to make an additional record, I believe it is highly improper for this court to admonish myself and Mr. Wright publicly on the record for our insistence that procedure be correctly followed. Your honor has, on numerous occasions, attempted to act as counsel for the government in such a manner that we ought to move for mistrial. However, in the interest of public accountability, we intend to move forward and to appeal any elements of the final ruling we believe to be rooted in bias toward counsel for the plaintiff. Your honor has also improperly slandered both of us, thereby further demonstrating bias toward us personally. You say we are not organized, prepared, or prompt enough, but it is your honor that has failed on multiple occasions to adhere to this court's own procedural time-tables. According to the record, we were supposed to proceed to trial more than a week ago but your honor has unduly delayed that process. Your honor states that its initial belief has been vindicated, thereby disrespecting the order of the appellate court that forced this court to permit additional counsel for the Plaintiff and, in so doing, asserted the rights of the Plaintiff in this matter. Thirdly, your honor states that no new witnesses will be permitted during the post-trial phase, but your honor fails to understand that these are not witnesses material to the cause of action. The witnesses we intend to introduce in post-trial are able to testify to the amount to which Ms. Jefferson is entitled as a billable rate that is honored by the many adult entertainment establishes that hire her on a regular basis. We have, for example, one witness that will testify to the fact that Ms. Jefferson is regularly paid a rate of $30,000 per hour. This, however, does not relate to the cause of action against the defendants but to the award. Therefore, a separate hearing is warranted during post-trial to ascertain and substantiate an award amount to which Ms. Jefferson is entitled as compensatory damages and punitive damages to follow. If your honor wishes to refuse us the ability to introduce these witnesses in post-trial or allow us to show cause for the damages we have claimed in our amended complaint, we will deal with the same on appeal following issuance of this court's final judgment. Finally, your honor improperly submits to the record an implied belief that either myself or Mr. Wright would submit what you refer to as 'idiotic legal theories'. In so doing, your honor shows bias toward counsel once more and already has created grounds for a new trial to be granted on appeal. As members of the bar, it is highly irregular and inappropriate for your honor to openly admonish counsel by inferring that we would ever submit legal theories that are 'idiotic' or, to use another term, frivolous. To submit frivolous legal theories would be grounds for admonishment by the state bar including disbarment – we have no intention of doing so, and your honor should refrain from disparaging counsel in this way without substantive cause. If there is reason to believe we've acted in a way that violates this court's orders, we would respectfully ask that this court adhere to the procedural rules regarding contempt of court and hold a proper hearing on the matter so that myself and Mr. Wright may have an opportunity to show cause before this court unduly admonishes us. With this, I will say once again that we are ready to proceed to trial." (( @almightybounter @Kotwica @NotCraft )) (( I wrote this all by myself without the need of AI tools ))

🙌 fire

The Execution I

The New Beachside Wave — Beach Kick Salesmen / Brothers In Arms ft. Newborn Playball (#6) Murray

This makes me regret dropping off Aslan and Frank's bond

The defense has nothing to add at this time, we are ready for trial. ((Nothing was directed to LSSD in the last posts. The thread was locked for a potential rule violation and then the plaintiff was speaking about LSPD's judgement)) @Jacob Rabinowitz @Kotwica @Userone @NotCraft