Jump to content

Horgen

Members
  • Posts

    163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Horgen

  1. 32 minutes ago, Chuckles said:

    I think the consensus is that low-mid stake games are not really a concern but these high-stake games tend to be relatively unregulated, unrealistic and unchallenged. I'd be in favour of introducing some form of not regulation, but separation. I think if we found a way to segregate them both we'd be working towards common ground. I'm against script regulation for low-mid stake games but high stakes should require some sort of imposition.

     

    This locks the formal of this suggestion pretty much. The law should be focused on the high-stake games because they're IRL very regulated and there is not much wind in the manipulation frame with these card games. If segregation appends to an OOC approval of the FM to players who're capable of handling the high-stakes in the most realistic way, then yes, I absolutely agree. And ofcourse, this doesn't only apply to casinos that are going to be managed, but actual players who have the knowledge to organise high-end card games in private. 

     

    Low-stake games should stay informal as of the FM approval terms and they're every-day based. There's not much going on with them and if the enhanced picture should go like this, then just maybe this whole picture might get into the enforceable frame.

     

     

  2. I think stuff like this shouldn't be appointed out to any gaming community, especially a very rigorous place like this. This one is far out of line. When it comes to child abuse, this one is a larger problem than we realise. For every child out there playing this game, the effects of child abuse can last for life, even though people think this is a game or whatever. I'm strongly against it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.