Harlow_Fletcher

The defendant has been notified.

Plaintiff v. Defendant Case Number: BCV24003 Prepared by: Harlow Fletcher CIVIL CASE BRIEF FOR [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] _______________________________________________ Argument 1.The Los Santos Police Department is a judicial agency operating in the Los Santos area, and Mister Nikolaj Volkov is an ordinary citizen with a registered address, a workplace and a vehicle, as well as valid documents. 2. On a Monday, July 22, Mister Volkov was walking home from work as his vehicle was being serviced,when a driver he already knew from the past offered him to give him a ride, Mr. Volkov accepted this offer and got into the vehicle, and they set off for their destination. 3. On the way home, the local law enforcement agency, i.e. the Los Santos Police Department, wanted to stop the driver of the vehicle, which revealed that the driver who picked up Mister Volkov has a criminal record and is being prosecuted. 4. The driver of the vehicle refused to comply with the police instructions and began to flee at high speed, making it impossible for Mister Volkov to leave the vehicle, due to this, Mister Volkov got into a vehicle with a criminal against his will. 5. During the chase, Mister Volkov repeatedly indicated to the police officers that he was not cooperating with the driver of the vehicle and was stuck in the car against his will. 6. After a long chase, the law enforcement agencies caught up with the fleeing driver and arrested him and Mister Volkov who identified himself several times during the arrest, by the way, Mr. Volkov was extremely cooperative during the procedure and did not obstruct the arrest in any way, therefore he did not give any reason to be considered as an accomplice. 7. Then the law enforcement officers took Mister Volkov to the police station and started interrogating him and asking him questions to which Mister Volkov answered, unfortunately, despite Mister Volkov's cooperation during the whole procedure, the police officers were extremely disrespectful to him and laughed in my client's eyes. 8. Neither during the interrogation nor during the arrest, the police officers did not read my client his rights, and they did not even inform my client why they were searching his clothes and why he was being taken to the police station, since they had no valid reason for doing so. 9. Then at the end of the interrogation, the police officers by name : Sergeant Hollow badge number : 30-7-40, Maximus Carrasco badge number : 40-924, they released my client and revoked his PF license, which they did completely illegally, since my client did not participate in the crime and cooperated with the instructions even though they were not correct and they did not even have a compelling reason for it. 10. After they let him go my client suffered multiple material damage and he had to take mental health treatment after the affair. Exhibits 1. Following the regulation, it can be seen on the police website that the revocation was completely illegal. (( Link to OOC Proof )) https://imgur.com/znxZb6M Witness List 1. Apart from the driver and the participating police officers, there were no other witnesses, and the bodycam recording of the police officers can also serve as evidence. _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 25th day of July, 2024 by: /s/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Harlow Fletcher

Plaintiff v. Defendant Case Number: BCV24003 Prepared by: Harlow Fletcher CIVIL CASE BRIEF FOR [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] _______________________________________________ Argument 1.The Los Santos Police Department is a judicial agency operating in the Los Santos area, and Mister Nikolaj Volkov is an ordinary citizen with a registered address, a workplace and a vehicle, as well as valid documents. 2. On a Monday, July 22, Mister Volkov was walking home from work as his vehicle was being serviced,when a driver he already knew from the past offered him to give him a ride, Mr. Volkov accepted this offer and got into the vehicle, and they set off for their destination. 3. On the way home, the local law enforcement agency, i.e. the Los Santos Police Department, wanted to stop the driver of the vehicle, which revealed that the driver who picked up Mister Volkov has a criminal record and is being prosecuted. 4. The driver of the vehicle refused to comply with the police instructions and began to flee at high speed, making it impossible for Mister Volkov to leave the vehicle, due to this, Mister Volkov got into a vehicle with a criminal against his will. 5. During the chase, Mister Volkov repeatedly indicated to the police officers that he was not cooperating with the driver of the vehicle and was stuck in the car against his will. 6. After a long chase, the law enforcement agencies caught up with the fleeing driver and arrested him and Mister Volkov who identified himself several times during the arrest, by the way, Mr. Volkov was extremely cooperative during the procedure and did not obstruct the arrest in any way, therefore he did not give any reason to be considered as an accomplice. 7. Then the law enforcement officers took Mister Volkov to the police station and started interrogating him and asking him questions to which Mister Volkov answered, unfortunately, despite Mister Volkov's cooperation during the whole procedure, the police officers were extremely disrespectful to him and laughed in my client's eyes. 8. Neither during the interrogation nor during the arrest, the police officers did not read my client his rights, and they did not even inform my client why they were searching his clothes and why he was being taken to the police station, since they had no valid reason for doing so. 9. Then at the end of the interrogation, the police officers by name : Sergeant Hollow badge number : 30-7-40, Maximus Carrasco badge number : 40-924, they released my client and revoked his PF license, which they did completely illegally, since my client did not participate in the crime and cooperated with the instructions even though they were not correct and they did not even have a compelling reason for it. 10. After they let him go my client suffered multiple material damage and he had to take mental health treatment after the affair. Exhibits 1. Following the regulation, it can be seen on the police website that the revocation was completely illegal. (( Link to OOC Proof )) https://imgur.com/znxZb6M Witness List 1. Apart from the driver and the participating police officers, there were no other witnesses, and the bodycam recording of the police officers can also serve as evidence. _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 25th day of July, 2024 by: /s/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Harlow Fletcher

Plaintiff v. Defendant Case Number: BCV24003 Prepared by: Harlow Fletcher CIVIL CASE BRIEF FOR [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] _______________________________________________ Argument 1.The Los Santos Police Department is a judicial agency operating in the Los Santos area, and Mister Nikolaj Volkov is an ordinary citizen with a registered address, a workplace and a vehicle, as well as valid documents. 2. On a Monday, July 22, Mister Volkov was walking home from work as his vehicle was being serviced,when a driver he already knew from the past offered him to give him a ride, Mr. Volkov accepted this offer and got into the vehicle, and they set off for their destination. 3. On the way home, the local law enforcement agency, i.e. the Los Santos Police Department, wanted to stop the driver of the vehicle, which revealed that the driver who picked up Mister Volkov has a criminal record and is being prosecuted. 4. The driver of the vehicle refused to comply with the police instructions and began to flee at high speed, making it impossible for Mister Volkov to leave the vehicle, due to this, Mister Volkov got into a vehicle with a criminal against his will. 5. During the chase, Mister Volkov repeatedly indicated to the police officers that he was not cooperating with the driver of the vehicle and was stuck in the car against his will. 6. After a long chase, the law enforcement agencies caught up with the fleeing driver and arrested him and Mister Volkov who identified himself several times during the arrest, by the way, Mr. Volkov was extremely cooperative during the procedure and did not obstruct the arrest in any way, therefore he did not give any reason to be considered as an accomplice. 7. Then the law enforcement officers took Mister Volkov to the police station and started interrogating him and asking him questions to which Mister Volkov answered, unfortunately, despite Mister Volkov's cooperation during the whole procedure, the police officers were extremely disrespectful to him and laughed in my client's eyes. 8. Neither during the interrogation nor during the arrest, the police officers did not read my client his rights, and they did not even inform my client why they were searching his clothes and why he was being taken to the police station, since they had no valid reason for doing so. 9. Then at the end of the interrogation, the police officers by name : Sergeant Hollow badge number : 30-7-40, Maximus Carrasco badge number : 40-924, they released my client and revoked his PF license, which they did completely illegally, since my client did not participate in the crime and cooperated with the instructions even though they were not correct and they did not even have a compelling reason for it. 10. After they let him go my client suffered multiple material damage and he had to take mental health treatment after the affair. Exhibits 1. Following the regulation, it can be seen on the police website that the revocation was completely illegal. (( Link to OOC Proof )) https://imgur.com/znxZb6M Witness List 1. Apart from the driver and the participating police officers, there were no other witnesses, and the bodycam recording of the police officers can also serve as evidence. _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 25th day of July, 2024 by: /s/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Harlow Fletcher

SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS COUNTY OF LOS SANTOS CIVIL DIVISION Case Name: Nikolaj Volkov vs Los Santos Police Department Plaintiff Attorney: Harlow Fletcher CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET _______________________________________________ 1. Check one box below that best describes this case: Personal Torts [ ] Assault, battery, or unlawful contact [ ] False imprisonment [x] Intentional infliction of emotional distress [x] Deprivation of rights under color of law Negligent Torts [x] Breach of duty [x] Negligent infliction of emotional distress [ ] Professional or Medical Negligence Property Torts [ ] Trespassing or Conversion [ ] Nuisance [ ] Theft [ ] Detainder Dignitary Torts [ ] Defamation (Slander or Libel) [ ] Invasion of privacy [ ] Breach of confidence [x] Abuse of process [ ] Malicious prosecution [ ] Alienation of affections Business Torts [ ] Fraud [ ] Tortious interference [ ] Conspiracy [ ] Restraint of trade [ ] Passing off Contracts [ ] Breach of Contract [ ] Collections Judicial Review [ ] Denial or Revocation of Business License [x] Denial or Revocation of Firearms License 2. List any damages sustained or fees accrued. Include billing rate for attorneys, expert witnesses, etc. Robbery and Assault: Value of stolen possessions : $10.000, medical expenses, pain and suffering. Job Loss: Past and future lost wages. Emotional Distress: Mental health treatment and pain and suffering. Legal Costs: $350,000 in attorney fees, plus $200 - $1,000 in court and administrative costs. _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 25th day of July, 2024 by: /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Nikolaj Volkov Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Harlow Fletcher Attorney for Plaintiff