Parckside
-
Posts
165 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
Calendar
News
Posts posted by Parckside
-
-
DAMEON 'LIL MADDMAN' BRACKENRIDGE, OUTLAWS 20'S BLOODS
Join our Discord: https://discord.gg/9DupdvhPsf
-
2
-
-
Your Information
Ingame & faction name: Robert_Moratillo, W/S Idlewood Family Bloods
Faction's thread:Reported Party
Faction(s) & leader's name: W/S 310 Gangster Crip
Faction thread:
Additional Information
Type of war, if any: STW (?)
Active agreement(s), if any: -
List of violations: Revenge Killing
Dates of incidents: 29/07, 30/07
Explanation (person(s) involved, backstory, conclusion, etc): This is a fairly straightforward report with a straightforward accusation. In evidence A you will see that we killed Tayvon Banks on 29/07 at 01:30 ingame time.
Today Tayvon Banks revenge killed alongside three of his faction members, shown in evidence B.
Evidence: A)
B)
Notes: -
Did you file any similar or related report on the Report Player section? No, I was told to faction report.
Did you try to solve it with the reported faction's leaders before reporting? I don't know who their leader is, and I don't believe they were online, but I attempted to contact Tayvon himself and he accidentally pmed me saying 'mane nigga just pmed me' which was clearly supposed to go to someone else.
If any, do you/your faction has any intention to end the conflict? Not bothered either way.-
1
-
-
-
First off, it is very clear you are confusing us with another faction. Some of these claims have literally nothing to do with us. Absolutely no one on our side is lying, that is an absurd statement of which your evidence does nothing to support.
Quote19/05/2024
A post made on their forum thread, of them murdering one of our members.
I unfortunately, have no idea why or where this happened.
So what are you implying, that he broke the rules? Why didn't Keon Collins report for DM then? He obviously had a valid, rule-abiding reason to kill him otherwise he would not have killed him, and you would have reported him for rulebreaking if there had been any.QuoteAround 22:20 IG time, Semaj Caldwell and Rashard Lattimore decided to walk directly through our turf, having being informed that the duo had previously that same day attempted to attack us, some of my members began to pressure them ICly, and attempt to fight them. This resulted in Semaj & Rashard to both open fire on my members.
https://gyazo.com/54554dab0cbb9cf6f49cf2b1d58058a5
The reason Semaj shot in this scenario is because y'all were attacking him with melee weapons in the middle of a brawl that you initiated. You say that it's 'your turf', but you have no turf. That turf is as much ours as it is yours, which is why all of these problems have occurred in the first place. You continuously choose to attack us within what you claim to be 'your turf', just because we are standing in an area which does not belong to you or any faction for that matter. This is the exact reason why the RoE prevent new factions from starting attacks, because you have no turf to create beef over.
Your own video literally shows that your side approaches him and then tries to jump him 6 on 1, of course if he has a gun he's going to attempt to defend himself. Either way, this changes absolutely nothing as I will allude to, Semaj was well within his right to shoot at a group of people trying to attack him 6 on 1 and did not break any rules.Quote20/05/2024
In the very early hour's around 1am IG time, we performed a hit on Idlewood Bloods. Looking back on it, it wasn't the smartest move but since we had been shot at several times by them already we wanted to get revenge, our plan was mainly to get Semaj, but he departed very quickly and got away, the whole situation resulting in us being gunned down. Our use of /mask during the hit was completely accidental as we had been wearing /mask the entire time and simply forgot to take them off.
That is an extremely poor excuse. All four of you simply forgot to unequip your /mask?
QuoteAnother forum post by Idlewood Bloods, showing them coming to US, provoking, then shooting. No idea when this incident occurred though. But I was told that It happened a day prior by some of my members.
(I believe this forum post was the first initial shooting that happened on the 19th that I referenced having no evidence of)
This was not the day prior. This occured only an an hour or so before the brawl on 19/05 showcased here: https://gyazo.com/54554dab0cbb9cf6f49cf2b1d58058a5 . Again, another brawl you initiated, not us, which broke the brawl cooldown timer of three hours. We made absolutely no effort to engage with you all, but in both of these scenarios you decided to try to jump our members 5-6 vs 1 because he was simply stood in 'your turf', which you do not have.
QuoteNo timestamp on this one, but it happened on the 20th.
The reasoning for this shooting also seems to suggest that he killed Zaire simply for being part of our faction? This situation was voided as seen above.
This is not our faction member. I have no idea why you have included this or what the relevance is. This literally speaks for the lack of control you have over your faction.Quote21/05/2024
https://imgur.com/a/incident-h4NabEX
An incident between one of my faction members, and some of theirs on our turf once again. Haven't got exact timestamp for this one unfortunately.
Again, whilst we were in the car speaking to you, this was not our member and we were just as confused as you as to why the /MASK attacked you.QuoteAround 21:00 IG time, Kevin Knox came to our turf and began provoking us, seemingly for NO apparent reason. There was a back and forth for around 3 minute's, before DeAndre Gamble began to shoot Kevin Knox. As soon as this happened, Kevin Knox jumps out to fire back + Another car full of members and automatics pulls up seemingly out of nowhere and shoots down DeAndre. No idea why Kevin decided to approach us & provoke, but as seen in the clip below he was armed and had a hit squad on stand-by
Kevin Knox is the IC friend of Daevion Carter, but he is not affiliated to our faction. I don't see the relevancy here, your side shot first and you got killed. Simple as that.
Quote25/05/2024
Around 1:55AM, they beat up some more of my members.
Around 24:45 IG time.
https://gyazo.com/01611e2fbd8b41d96ae12dbab21c0d35
Their first supposed attack on us ever? An M4 and 3 Pistols were used.
It is our first attack on you, please tell me what other attacks we have performed on you considering brawls or not considered a faction attack? I would like to know. Every other situation you have mentioned so far has been either your side starting a brawl against us, or your side shooting at us and breaking RoE/RKing whilst doing it.
QuoteA brawl broke out between us & them since they were standing directly on our turf. Xing was killed during this altercation scriptwise (no idea whether it is a bug or not but they decided to BW all of us instead of letting us RP). We had all backed up in an attempt to RP our injuries, but were instead chased down and BW'd.
https://gyazo.com/75b919d509c6afd64e4ac389d84e3c5a
https://gyazo.com/a0c3fc29bfcd9af2f1d1c6cf716b5caa
https://gyazo.com/cb8922ef24ce633b50cdedb0cdbd151c
https://gyazo.com/9c1dfecc3cf37a4f50e47b25423aefa0
https://gyazo.com/de94a350e22bbe9a18f3e68ef999d528
He's knocked out, not BWed. I don't know if you are aware of the difference. Doesn't constitute a faction attack, no one got 'chased down and BW'd'.
QuoteAfter we brawled it out and they /heal'd and returned right back to our block. After seeing this, and seeing that the members had REMAINED on our block AFTER a brawl I decided to shoot them with Jian.
https://gyazo.com/42da3d196bf4a2a9db70193bb5fcffc7
Again, you do not have faction turf. This is as much our block as it is yours. You just admitted that you engaged with us in a brawl, then proceeded to perform a faction attack and revenge kill as you were killed on 21/05/2024 as I mentioned in the initial report.QuoteNow that we've got a much clearer and honest timeline, a much clearer picture is painting of our interactions. I've made it incredibly clear that we were not in fact the ones to begin this feude, nor were we the first ones to perform an attack. They themselves had posted two screenshots on their own forum of them shooting at us on our turf (Fromn the 19th onwards) proving that they themselve's had broken the cooldown rule, not once but TWICE and plastered it on their own forum. Our first attack on them was purely a retaliation for these previous events.
I find it very interesting that your timeline conveniently cuts off here. What about you RKing when you decided to shoot Eric Thomas and Kourtney Boyd over a fist fight? How come you decided not to address that? Did you hope IFM would simply forget about one of the most important accusations I made against you?
Furthermore, please tell me how we broke the cooldown rules when you were the one to initiate ALL of these brawls, attacks etc? You have literally only shown a SINGLE scenario in which we were the aggressor here. You continuously have used this idea that Crystal Gardens is 'your turf' to justify these brawls/attacks, despite the fact you do not have a turf and no one on the server has a turf.QuoteThe third incident that we are being reported for, clear as DAY shows Kevin Knox (Apparently not even a member of their faction) provoking us, and then with absolutely perfect timing being supported by Idlewood bloods. This was a clear case of either MetaGaming OR a set up ambush.
You shot first here, not us. I will concede that considering Deandre's actual target was Kevin Knox, and not the members of our faction, then this doesn't exactly constitute the RKing accusation I made for this specific attack, but it matters not considering you all have committed further RK on the 28th.
QuoteThe fourth incident is a COMPLETE and UTTER LIE, that was NOT their first & only attack on us, and trying to act like it is, comes acoss as INCREDIBLY spiteful and disingenuous. It seems like yet ANOTHER attempt, to try and get us punished, and make it seem as if we've been harrassing them, when its been the other way around. (Once again, reference my points from the 19th Onwards). A very VERY brazen lie considering they have posted screenshots themselves killing us on their forum.
As per what is written in the RoE, yes this was our first attack.QuoteNow the fifth and final incident, once again, shows them on our turf, we brawl, they BW ALL of us, linger around our turf after and attack, and then even trying to c-bug whilst shooting at one of my members.
Again, this is not the 'fifth and final incident', why have you tried to ignore the incident I reported on 28/05 wherein you Revenge Killed and Deathmatched Eric Thomas and Kourtney Boyd?QuoteNow I believe it is very evident that there have been several lies told here in this report, ESPECIALLY regarding attacks from their side. They've out right lied about attacking us and I also believe they may have lied to @badhbh too when they spoke privately. They began ALL of this and we have merely retaliated against them. Our conduct throughout all of this was by no means perfect, and I am willing to take responsibility where it is due, but I do believe that I have cleared a large chunk of allegations against us (Apart from our second attack, that was pretty stupid of us)
I hope their lies can be addressed and I hope that they receive as stern of a warning as we did for attacking prior to the 24th. I may add any extra evidence incase I missed anything, but this is my only reply to these allegations.
What attacks from our side, please? The majority of your list consistutes of brawls which are NOT considered faction attacks. In the case of Semaj Caldwell shooting you before the 24th, you attempted to jump him 6on1 on two occasions, using melee weapons in one of the occasions. He had every right to shoot and get out of the situation. I specifically chose provide a timeline of faction attacks because they are the only relevant part of this report, since we are accusing you of breaching the faction attack cooldown and of revenge killing. The one faction attack we did initiate was on 25/05, and I stand firmly on that as per the server's RoE.
This continuous accusation that I am lying throughout the report is frankly childish, as are your attempts to flip this report on its head. I have backed every accusation that I have made with hard evidence, so I don't know what exactly I am 'lying' about. You have admitted that your attack on 21/05/2024 broke multiple rules, and you have chosen not to respond to the accusation of revenge killing during the attack you made on 28/05/2024. Clearly, you have either failed to understand the server's rules and the faction RoE, or you have simply chosen to ignore them. Either way, there are several counts of rulebreaking here, even by your own admission.
-
Even though I think any attempt at sabotaging nametag hacks is a good thing, I still prefer the current look of firstname_lastname. A lot of people are playing for nostalgia purposes and I don’t see why this is necessary.
If the devs could figure out a custom nametag system that would allow them to at least try to combat nametag hackers, I’m all for it. I’d rather the devs at least tried to stop it than simply accept it. Hackers would have to create new scripts, and in turn the devs could update the server’s nametags in light of any newly created hack they were made aware of.
It’d be an improvement on 50+% of the server using nametags.
Just make sure that if that happens, it looks the same visually, underscores and all.
-
1
-
-
Your Information
Ingame & faction name: Terrance_Lane, W/S Idlewood Family Bloods
Faction's thread:Reported Party
Faction(s) & leader's name: NINER FUNCTION, unsure
Faction thread:
Additional Information
Type of war, if any: -
Active agreement(s), if any: -
List of violations: Attacking before faction opening clause, Deathmatching, Revenge Killing, Poor escalation, Unwarranted use of large firearms, poor RP quality.
Dates of incidents: From 21/05/2024 to 28/05/2024
Explanation (person(s) involved, backstory, conclusion, etc):I will start this report by saying that from the first day of the server, 'NINER FUNCTION' have shown an absolute disregard for the server rules, as well as a very poor standard of roleplay. They are clearly playing the server for the wrong reasons, jumping at any opportunity to shoot first and have already been severly warned by IFM for failing to properly log faction attacks as well as breaching RoE already by attacking before the server had even existed for one week (@badhbh can confirm this).
Because quite some time has passed since the server opening and this faction's continuous disruption of our RP, I am going to attempt to outline all of NINER FUNCTION's faction attacks on ourselves in a short time scale. It should be noted we have only initiated a SINGLE faction attack on NINER FUNCTION since the server opened, whereas they have continuously attacked us back to back to back for little to no reason.21/05/2024 - around 01:40 IG ((Deathmatch, use of /MASK in a faction attack, attacking before faction has been opened for 1 week)): Niner Function attacks our faction for an unknown reason (presumably due to a brawl that occured the day prior of which they initiated). They attack using /MASK which is prohibited and long guns. We believe two of the masks were Melique Kaymar and Deandre Gamble. They kill Malcolm Hives, Torriano Foster and a couple others before being killed by our side in defence. This was extremely poor escalation since we had only interacted once prior in a singular brawl. This attack took place before the server had been open for one week, so their faction could not have existed for more than 1 week.
https://i.imgur.com/Q43c3F8.mp423/05/2024 - around 21:30 IG ((Deathmatch, chaining attacks without retaliation from our side, breaching attack party size limit, poor escalation, attacking before faction has been opened for 1 week)) : Niner function attacks us again, this time using 6 members and for another unknown reason (we did not retaliate to the aforementioned attack, meaning this is another RoE breach as well as DM). This was the attack in which badhbh became involved, warning their faction leader for failing to control his faction members as well as failing to properly log attacks. I believe they were also told to avoid interacting with us. I believe this scenario needs to be revisited since Niner Function's leader told badhbh that his members had performed this attack without his consent. This does not excuse the fact that it was also DM however, and that as far as I know none of the individual attackers were punished for DM, the situation was simply voided.
24/05/2024 - around 21:00 IG ((Revenge kill, attempted deathmatch, attacking before faction has been opened for 1 week)): NINER FUNCTION member Deandre Gamble attacks our faction members despite being PKed (shown in the first attack where we believe he was /MASKed). We do not know why he attacked here, but our members managed to kill him:
https://i.imgur.com/YNQpsl1.mp425/05/2024 - around 00:44 IG: Our only ever attack on NINER FUNCTION takes place. Due to the attack the day prior by Deandre Gamble, as well as the combined total of unvoided attacks NINER FUNCTION made on us since the start of the server, we made our first and only retaliation. We killed Melique Kaymar, Liam Brixton, Jian Khiu and Deante Palmer.
28/05/2024 - around 23:00 IG ((Revenge kill, Deathmatch)): Niner Function shoot after a brawl takes place, Melique Kaymar runs out with a shotgun gunning down Eric Thomas and Kourtney Boyd, meaning he has now been killed twice in our interactions and thus has RKed. Again, after IFM's warning to their faction it is very disappointing to see this level of poor escalation and rulebreaking from their faction again.
Evidence: Interlaced above for clarity.
Notes: Overall, I believe the above evidence raises a lot of questions about NINER FUNCTION's place on LSRP. They have already been warned by IFM before, having situations voided due to ROE breaches, and now they are continuing to repeat the same examples of poor-escalation and deathmatching. I would be very interested to see how NINER FUNCTION could try to justify some of these faction attacks and their weapon usage, especially considering we have continuously chosen not to retaliate.
Did you file any similar or related report on the Report Player section? If so, link: -
Did you try to solve it with the reported faction's leaders before reporting? If so, what was the outcome? No, bceause IFM have spoken to their leader before on my behalf and he has failed to heed their warnings.
If any, do you/your faction has any intention to end the conflict? I have zero interest in RPing any form of conflict with this faction unless they are able to follow the server's rules. -
Cool video, take it far
-
1
-
-
Los Angeles Gang Cars
As with almost everything in LA gang culture, there are exceptions to every 'rule'. This guide, however, aims to give a basic (and perhaps somewhat simplified) outline of the various 'cars' that exist in LA, and their relationships with one another. I've also included some comical descriptions of some gangs/cars that were produced by LA Hood Media. Generally speaking, these cards are used to formulate cliques within county jails, although again these are not always so clear cut.
Disclaimer: This guide is simply composed from the information in which I have gathered over the years in researching gangs in LA and and talking to their members. I am positively sure that even amongst actual gang members from LA, much of this information could be disputed. With that said, if you have a compelling argument that you would like to share with me in regards to the information posted here, I would be glad to hear you out over Discord (tmc.noel) or Forum PM. To avoid unconstructive back and forth/attempts at public dick-measuring contests, I would ask that you raise any concerns with me in private rather than in the replies here.
Rollin' O's/NHC (SCLA):
Description: The Rollin' O's/NeighborHood Crips are two cars that are technically seperate, although are so similar in nature that they are typically considered to be the same thing. Where you will find a gang that claims Rollin', you will almost always (with the exception of the Rollin' 30's Harlem Crips) find that they also claim NeighborHood. In contrast, gangs such as the East Coast Crips are considered (at least in the modern day) to be part of the NeighborHood Crip card, but not the Rollin' O's card.
Examples: Rollin' 30's Harlem Crip, Rollin' 40's NeighborHood Crip, Rollin' 60's NeighborHood Crip, 76 East Coast Crip, Rollin' 100's Crip.
Relations: The Rollin' O's/NeighborHood Crips are one of the largest but most hated cards in the city. They have beef with almost every other car that exists in LA, including the Hoover Criminals, Bloods/Brims/Piru and Gangster Crips.Deuces (2x) (West LA):
Description: The Deuces (2x) are a card that is often incorrectly made synonymous with the aforementioned Rollin O's and NeighborHood Crips. In actuality, the Deuces (2x) are a completely separate card that exists only in West LA. With that said, the reason for their association with Rollin' and NHC gangs is a valid one, in that they almost always hang out with and share enemies with NHC and Rollin gangs. The importance in recognising this difference is that Deuces (2x) do not claim NHC/Rollin', and NHC/Rollin' gangs do not claim Deuces (2x).
Examples: West Boulevard Crip, Geer Gang Crip, Venice Shoreline Crip.
Relations: The Deuces (2x) card shares the same enemies as the Rollin'/NHC card, but due to their geographical location tend to beef more with Trays (3x) gangs, as well as Bloods/Brims/Pirus over Hoover Criminals and SCLA Gangster Crips.Gangster Crips (Movin') (SCLA), Trays (3x) (West LA, LBC):
Description: The Gangster Crips are a separate off-shoot of the original Crip gangs that were formed during the 1970s and 1980s. They are typically more renowned for infighting within their card, and there are various gangs that claim Gangster Crip or Movin' that are not considered to be true members of the Gangster Crip/Movin' card by other gangs (for instance 4238 Gangster Crip). The term 'Movin' originates as a response to the 'Rollin' gangs that the Gangster Crips came into conflict with.
Unlike the Deuces (2x) card's differentiation between themselves and NHC/Rollin O's, the Trays (3x) card is a lot more closely linked to the other Gangster Crips in SCLA. You might often see 83 Gangster Crip writing '3x' on a wall for instance (some would argue because of 83 Gangsters, others because they claim Trays (3x)). There are arguments to be had as to whether the two should be considered separate in the same way that Deuces (2x) and Rollin/NHC are, however generally speaking I believe most people would categorize them together at least in the modern day.
Examples: Playboy Gangster Crips (Trays 3x), Marvin Gangster Crips (Trays 3x), Blastin Fools Gangster Crips (Trays 3x), Avalon Gangster Crips, 52/112 Broadway Gangster Crip, 83 Gangster Crip, 87 Gangster Crip, 4238 Gangster Crip (conflicted opinions).
Relations: The Gangster Crips typically are neutral with Hoover Criminals, have mixed relations with Bloods/Brims/Pirus and strongly oppose NeighborHood/Rollin' Crips. They have various inner conflicts across gangs within the card.Bloods/Brims/Pirus (Damu) (SCLA, CPT, Watts, Inglewood):
Description: Bloods, Brims and Pirus are typically considered the #1 enemy towards all Crips. In the 20th century, this was definitely closer to being the case, however due to the continuous infighting between gangs, this is no longer really true. Due to historically being outnumbered by opposing gangs (particularly Bloods and Brims), relations between the various 'Damu' (blood) gangs in LA have been less rocky than that of the Crips, as 'Damu' gangs have often relied on cliqueing up with another to defeat their enemies.
The same cannot necessarily said for the Pirus that are found in Compton (Bompton) who tend to defy the bounds of typical card's relations, beefing between specific neighborhoods rather than card vs card.
Examples: Rollin 30's Piru, Rollin' 20's NeighborHood Bloods, Fruit Town Brim, Rollin' 20's Outlaw Bloods, Mad Swan Bloods, Harvard Park Brim, Van Ness Gangster Brim, Centinela Park Family Bloods, Inglewood Family Gangster Bloods, Avenue Piru, Westside Piru, Mob Piru, Bounty Hunter Watts Bloods.
Relations: Blood/Brim/Piru gangs typically oppose all Crips, but particularly NeighborHood/Rollin/Deuces (2x) crips in the modern day. They are typically neutral with Hoover Criminals, and some Blood gangs even share alliances with Gangster Crips (usually) in the modern day.
Hoover Criminals (SCLA):
Description: The Hoover Criminals are another one of the main cars that can be found in SCLA. They were originally known as the Hoover Groovers, then the Hoover Crips, but dropped the 'Crips' in place of 'Criminals' due to conflict between themselves and various Crip sets in the 1990s. The Hoovers are often regarded as one of the most notorious cards in the city due to the fact that they have historically pushed the 'EBK' (everybody killa) identity. In the modern day however, they primarily only share conflict with the various NHC/Rollin gangs.
Examples: 52 Hoover Gangster Crips, 74 Hoover Criminals Gang, 83 Hoover Criminals Gang, 924 Hoover Criminals Gang, 107 Hoover Criminals Gang, 112 Hoover Criminals Gang.
Relations: In the modern day, the Hoover Criminal's primary adversaries belong to the NHC/Rollin' O's card. They are typically neutral or allied with Gangster Crips, and some sets have specific beef with certain Blood/Brim/Piru gangs, although they share an equal number of neutral relationships with Bloods/Brims/Pirus.Hub & Dub (CPT, Watts):
Description: The Hub (Hub City) and Dub (the letter 'W' in Watts) card is an alliance that exists between Watts Crips and Compton Crips, which primarily exists in county jails. This card is not as organised as the aforementioned cards due to the fact that conflict within Watts and Compton is very complex and tends to be on a neighborhood vs neighborhood basis, rather than many gangs versus many gangs like we see in SCLA.
Examples: Atlantic Drive Compton Crip, South Side Compton Crips, Kelly Park Compton Crips, Park Village Compton Crips, PJ Watts Crips, Grape Street Watts Crips, Ten Line Gangster Crips.
Relations: As aforementioned, since the conflicts within Watts and Compton are typically between specific neighborhoods, rather than being card on card, blood on crip etc. it is not very easy to categorize their relationships. The Hub & Dub card exists primarily to help fight larger enemies (such as Bloods/Brims/Pirus) in county jails, and is less important on the streets.Long Beach Crips (LBC):
Description: The Long Beach Crip card is another card which really only exists behind the walls of a county jail. In fact, most of the gangs that make up the Long Beach Crip card in jail have conflict on the streets outside - this is often put aside to fend off common enemies such as hispanic gangs.
Examples: Rollin 20's Long Beach Crip, (Baby) Insane Gangster Crip, Westcoast 80's Crip, Blacc Bandit Crip, Linden Blocc Gangster Crip, Mac Mafia Crip, Naughty Nasty Gangster Crip.
Relations: Long Beach Crips have their own conflicts on the streets, which are generally shared between the Northside and Eastside, as well as between the gangs that claim Movin, Swervin and Rollin. On top of that, there is a racial element to the conflicts in Long Beach - pitting black gangs against hispanic gangs. Individual gangs share certain relations with gangs in SCLA or other parts of LA, such as the Insane Crip's alliance with Hoover Criminals.Others: Mafia Crip (SCLA), Hustler Crip (SCLA):
Description: These are grouped together primarily because they have very little remaining gangs that remain exclusively within each card. For instance, gangs such as Main Street Mafia Crip have practically aligned to the NHC/Rollin O's card, to the point in which some members even claim NHC, this means that there is really only one true active Mafia Crip gang left in SCLA, which is W/S 99 Mafia Crip (not E/S 99 Mafia Watts Crip). The same can be said for Hustler Crips in that the only active remaining true Hustler Crip gang is Eastside Hustler Crip (104HXHC claim Rollin' O's/NHC due to affinity with the Rollin' 100's alliance).
Generally speaking, when it comes to county jail, these cards would simply clique up with their allies.
Examples: W/S 99 Mafia Crip, Eastside Hustler Crip.
Relations: Each of these cards have their own relations with other gangs that are now based more around neighborhood vs neighborhood conflict, versus card vs card conflict.-
1
-
8
-
Verona Shoreline Crip
in Unofficial Factions
Posted
gangnism