nfr.ai

SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS COUNTY OF LOS SANTOS CIVIL DIVISION Case Name: Mark Lim v. Los Santos Police Department Plaintiff Attorney: Xavier Castenda CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET _______________________________________________ 1. Check one box below that best describes this case: Personal Torts [ X] Assault, battery, or unlawful contact [ ] False imprisonment [ ] Intentional infliction of emotional distress [ ] Deprivation of rights under color of law Negligent Torts [ X] Breach of duty [ X] Negligent infliction of emotional distress [X ] Professional or Medical Negligence Property Torts [ ] Trespassing or Conversion [ X] Nuisance [ ] Theft [ ] Detainder Dignitary Torts [ ] Defamation (Slander or Libel) [ ] Invasion of privacy [ ] Breach of confidence [X ] Abuse of process [ ] Malicious prosecution [ ] Alienation of affections Business Torts [ ] Fraud [ ] Tortious interference [ ] Conspiracy [ ] Restraint of trade [ ] Passing off Contracts [ ] Breach of Contract [ ] Collections Judicial Review [ ] Denial or Revocation of Business License [ ] Denial or Revocation of Firearms License 2. List any damages sustained or fees accrued. Include billing rate for attorneys, expert witnesses, etc. List Medical expenses: $50,000 Pain and suffering: $2,000,000 Lost wages: $200,000 Rehabilitation: $320,000 _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 10 day of November 2024 by; Xavier Castenda, Mark Lim /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Mark Lim Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Xavier Castenda Attorney for Plaintiff Mark Lim v. Los Santos Police Department Case Number: YY-XNNN Prepared by: Xavier Castenda, Mark Lim CIVIL CASE BRIEF FOR MARK LIM V. LOS SANTOS POLICE DEPARTMENT _______________________________________________ ARGUMENTS 1.Mark Lim taking photo of night time Gantos photo, suddenly large group of gun shot between some Mexican people like with Law Enforcement, countless body count on the floor, a lot of people were injured and dead. 2.Mark Lim standing behind the car in far distance while watching the gun shootout and take some rare photo of the gun shot, suddenly the black male officer in the photo turn his m4 gun point to Mark Lim without warning, and shoot at Mark Lim. Mark Lim left arms was shot by the M4 bullet. 3. Mark Lim decided to run behind his company car (Huntley) few meter away, hiding behind the car with his Boss "Osman" and the police officer decided to finish his M4 bullet while attempts to shot at us. 4. In the photo you can clearly see that the officer start shooting at random target, not where the Mexican gunner located. And the black male police officer just run away from the scene. Photo of aftermatch, a lot of innocent police officer and citizen dead at the scene. 5. Officer Start shooting at random direction. EXHBITS & WITNESSES Exhibits PLAINTIFF EXHBIT A - Evidence of showing that LSPD Officer, shoots Mark Lim without any cause - PLAINTIFF EXHBIT B - LSPD Officer shooting at random direction PLAINTIFF EXHBIT C - Mark Lim Wounds, described by the doctor. PLAINTIFF EXHBIT D - Video where you can see that LSPD Officer shoots Mark Lim. Witness List D.N.A _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 10 day of November 2024 by; Xavier Castenda, Mark Lim /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Mark Lim Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Xavier Castenda Attorney for Plaintiff

bump

Your Honor, we would like to file an re-motion. Michelle Jefferson Plaintiff, v. Los Santos Police Department Defendant. Case No.: 24-CV-1034 Superior Court of Los Santos Los Santos, SA 90012 MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michelle Jefferson, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedur 2031.310 and 2030.300, hereby submits this Motion to Compel Production of Evidence. Specifically, we request the production of bodycam and dash cam footage from Officer Sergeant Amber Moore. These materials are essential for the proper adjudication of case number 24-CV-1034. II. BACKGROUND On September 15, 2024, the plaintiff submitted discovery requests, including requests for bodycam and dash cam footage from Officer Sergeant Amber Moore. Despite multiple attempts to obtain these materials and subsequent follow-up requests, the Los Santos Police Department has failed to provide the requested evidence or respond to the requests. III. REQUEST FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully requests that the court order the Los Santos Police Department to produce the following evidence: Bodycam footage from Officer Sergeant Amber Moore, including all recordings related to incidents occurring on August 17, 23, 26, 28, 30, and September 2, 9, 10, 12, and 14. Dash cam footage from the police vehicle occupied by Sergeant Amber Moore, including all recordings related to incidents occurring on August 17, 23, 26, 28, 30, and September 2, 9, 10, 12, and 14. IV. ARGUMENT Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedur Sections 2031.310 and 2030.300, a party may file a motion to compel if the opposing party fails to respond to discovery requests or provides inadequate responses. The requested footage is crucial for establishing facts in the case and may have a decisive impact on the outcome. V. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit A: Copy of discovery requests for bodycam and dash cam footage, submitted on August 17, 23, 26, 28, 30, and September 2, 9, 10, 12, and 14. Exhibit B: Copy of correspondence or lack of response from Los Santos Police Department. Exhibit C ;Proof of attempts to resolve the dispute without court intervention. VI. SIGNATURE Xavier Castenda Castenda Law Firm Los Santos, SAN ANDREAS, 90004 2247739 [email protected] Signature: Xavier Castenda Date: 18th Of September, 2024.

Your Honor, I would like to respond to the allegations made against the Plaintiff’s side. I understand the defense attorney’s intent, but I believe your argument is without merit! What you stated about the supposed incorrect filing is simply a misunderstanding; nearly 80% of lawyers use this particular format for submitting motions. Furthermore, the omission of the date in the motion is not a result of a lack of diligence but rather a technical error. The information regarding the incident is provided at the bottom, so mistakes can happen to anyone - especially since this is my first time in court. Your Honor, I ask for your understanding and request the opportunity to resubmit the motion to compel production of evidence if necessary.

Superior Court of Los Santos County of Los Santos Civil Division Case No: 24-CV-1034 Case Name: Michelle Jefferson v. Los Santos Police Department Plaintiff’s Brief on the Use of AI in Legal Filings Your Honor, I, Xavier Castenda, counsel for the Plaintiff in the above-captioned matter, respectfully submit this brief in response to the Court’s order to address the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of legal documents. 1. Nature of AI Assistance The AI tools utilized in this case served as drafting aids and not as replacements for professional judgment. Specifically: Drafting Support: The AI was employed to assist in drafting initial versions of legal documents, including generating boilerplate text and suggesting language improvements. This use was intended to streamline the document preparation process and ensure clarity and consistency. Human Oversight: The AI Tool helped me to see if i have maken any mistake in the documents. Law: The use of ChatGPT or AI is not prohibited by any code in San Andreas, so I do not see any reason for dispute. 2. Counsel’s Oversight I affirm that: Error Detection: Every document prepared by me was subjected to analysis by AI to identify whether any errors had been made. AI helped in pinpointing potential issues that required correction. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Xavier Castenda Attorney for Plaintiff Michelle Jefferson Date: 17th Of September, 2024

Your Honor, we would like to file an motion. Michelle Jefferson Plaintiff, v. Los Santos Police Department Defendant. Case No.: 24-CV-1034 Superior Court of Los Santos Los Santos, SA 90012 MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michelle Jefferson, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedur 2031.310 and 2030.300, hereby submits this Motion to Compel Production of Evidence. Specifically, we request the production of bodycam and dash cam footage from Officer Sergeant Amber Moore. These materials are essential for the proper adjudication of case number 24-CV-1034. II. BACKGROUND On September 15, 2024, the plaintiff submitted discovery requests, including requests for bodycam and dash cam footage from Officer Sergeant Amber Moore. Despite multiple attempts to obtain these materials and subsequent follow-up requests, the Los Santos Police Department has failed to provide the requested evidence or respond to the requests. III. REQUEST FOR RELIEF Plaintiff respectfully requests that the court order the Los Santos Police Department to produce the following evidence: Bodycam footage from Officer Sergeant Amber Moore, including all recordings related to incidents occurring on [insert dates]. Dash cam footage from the police vehicle occupied by Sergeant Amber Moore, including all recordings related to incidents occurring on [insert dates]. IV. ARGUMENT Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedur Sections 2031.310 and 2030.300, a party may file a motion to compel if the opposing party fails to respond to discovery requests or provides inadequate responses. The requested footage is crucial for establishing facts in the case and may have a decisive impact on the outcome. V. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit A: Copy of discovery requests for bodycam and dash cam footage, submitted on August 17, 23, 26, 28, 30, and September 2, 9, 10, 12, and 14. Exhibit B: Copy of correspondence or lack of response from Los Santos Police Department. Exhibit 😄 Proof of attempts to resolve the dispute without court intervention. VI. SIGNATURE Xavier Castenda Castenda Law Firm Los Santos, SAN ANDREAS, 90004 2247739 [email protected] Signature: Xavier Castenda Date: September 15, 2024

Case Name: Michelle Jefferson v. Los Santos Police Department Case No: 24-CV-1034 Plaintiff’s Motion in Response to Defense Arguments Presented by: Xavier Castenda, Esq. Date: 17th of September, 2024. Superior Court of Los Santos Los Santos, SA 90012 Dear Honorable Judge, On behalf of my client, Michelle Jefferson, I respectfully submit the following arguments in response to the claims made by the Los Santos Police Department. We assert that the Plaintiff’s claims are fully justified and that the arguments presented by LSPD are unfounded and unsupported by the facts. Below, we outline the key arguments that substantiate the Plaintiff’s claims: False Arrest and Breach of Duty My client, Michelle Jefferson, has been repeatedly arrested by LSPD officers without proper legal grounds. The documentation and evidence presented in this case reveal numerous irregularities in the arrest process. The arrests were conducted based on incorrect or incomplete information, and LSPD officers failed to follow proper legal procedures. Multiple instances of false arrests indicate systematic violations of the Plaintiff’s rights and misconduct on the part of LSPD. Deprivation of Rights Under the Pretext of Law The Plaintiff asserts that her rights to free speech and assembly were repeatedly violated through false arrests for "Riot" and "Inciting a Riot." Evidence shows that the Plaintiff participated in peaceful protests that were unjustly suppressed by LSPD. The arrests and charges were applied inappropriately and were, in reality, attempts to suppress her right to peacefully express her views. The actions of LSPD were unlawful and infringed upon the Plaintiff’s fundamental rights. Emotional Distress Claims The Plaintiff is seeking compensation for emotional distress caused by unjustified arrests and citations. Evidence in this case, including medical reports and witness testimonies, confirms the severe emotional impact that LSPD’s actions had on the Plaintiff. The conduct of the officers, including harassment and baseless arrests, adversely affected the Plaintiff’s mental health, justifying her claims for damages. False Citations The Plaintiff is seeking damages for false citations related to "Unlawful Assembly." These citations were issued improperly and were not based on actual violations of the law. Documentation shows that the Plaintiff was penalized for participating in peaceful assemblies, which constitutes a violation of her rights to assembly and free speech. The issuance of these citations was unfounded and constituted an abuse of power by LSPD. Conclusion The allegations made by LSPD are baseless and unsupported by evidence. The actions of LSPD, including false arrests, rights violations, and unjustified citations, have had serious consequences for the Plaintiff, Michelle Jefferson. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claims are fully justified, and she is entitled to appropriate compensation. We respectfully request that the Plaintiff’s claims be upheld and that a judgment be issued in her favor. Witnesses will be summoned to court shortly. Sincerely, /S/ Xavier Castenda, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff

Castenda's Law Office YOUR JUSTICE. OUR COMMITMENT Castenda's Law Office HISTORY Castenda'sLaw Office is a family law firm considered the best in Los Santos, the ownership has been passed down from generation to generation. In 2023, the law firm won over 8,700 cases in the Los Santos District Court, and over 1,100 in the Court of Appeals! Castenda's Law Office employs only Harvard Law School graduates because they focus on the highest standards. Currently, our law firm has over 250 Harvard Alumni! Our law firm delves into areas such as: San Andreas PENAL CODE San Andreas VECHICLE CODE San Andreas CIVIL CODE San Andreas FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL CODE San Andreas HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE Castenda's Law Office OWNER Name And Surname: Xavier Castenda. Age: 31. Education: Graduate of Harvard Law School Professional Experience: Internship at the prestigious law firm Castenda's Law Office, Xavier worked there for 4 years As a lawyer in the field of Civil, Vechicle and Health And Safety Code - he had most cases in the Court of Appeal During his years at Harvard, Xavier studied with 1 of 5 Supreme Court Justices. Character Description: Xavier Castenda is an experienced lawyer, known for his uncompromising and professionalism. Castenda completed law studies at Harvard University, specializing in Vechicle, Civil, Penal, FAG and HAS Code, where he passed the appropriate State Bar Exam. He has a strong sense of justice, which motivates him to fight for the rights of his clients. He is ambitious, determined and always strives for perfection. His personality combines severity at work with empathy for those in need of legal assistance. Additional Services: Organization of open days during which the client can receive free legal advice. Mediation and negotiations in family and business disputes. Online Legal Advice. Organized workshops and legal training for citizens and entrepreneurs. Contacts with other parties: Arranging, negotiating and organizing business meetings. Cooperation with other companies and institutions on the server Contact - Mail. OOC - If you want to RP as an lawyer, or take an partnership - pm me on discord; yollite or forum

nice work right there!

thats an good staff member

good boy

Your Honor, the prosecuting party would like to file a motion. Michelle Jefferson Plaintiff, v. Los Santos Police Department Defendant. Case No. {24-CV-1034} MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Michelle Jefferson, pursuant to San Andreas Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2031.310 and 2030.300, hereby submits this Motion to Compel Discovery in the matter of case number [24-CV-1034]. II. BACKGROUND Discovery Requests for disclosure of information: On September 15, 2024, the plaintiff served documents - police reports of Officer Sergeant Amber Moore, created and constituted evidence in the case Despite repeated attempts to obtain the requested information, including the case and the request, which was sent a day/several days ago, the Los Santos Police Department failed to respond appropriately or provide the requested documents. III. REQUEST FOR RELIEF Plaintiff asks the court to compel the Los Santos Police Department to respond to the following discovery requests: Police report of Sergeant Amber Moore. The plaintiff also requests that the court impose appropriate sanctions for failure to fulfill explanatory obligations, including the inability to obtain compensation in the case for the accusing party IV. ARGUMENT Under San Andreas Code of Civil Procedure Sections 2031.310 and 2030.300, a party may file a motion to compel if the opposing party fails to respond to discovery requests or provides inadequate responses. The requested documents are crucial to establishing that it constitutes one piece of evidence in a case that shows that all incidents V. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit A: Copy of the discovery requests served on 17th, 23rd, 26th, 28th, 30th, of August + 2nd, 9th, 10th, 12th and now also 14th of September. Exhibit B: Copy of the responses received, if any, or correspondence showing the failure to respond. Exhibit C: Proof of attempts to resolve the dispute without court intervention. VI. SIGNATURE Xavier Castenda Castenda Law Firm Los Santos, SAN ANDREAS, 90004 2247739 [email protected] Signature: Castenda's Date: 15th of September, 2024.