-
Posts
18 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Levy, Bell & Weinstein's Achievements
Enthusiast (6/14)
13
Reputation
-
Plaintiff v. Defendant Case Number: YY-XNNN Prepared by: Ari Levy CIVIL CASE BRIEF FOR [PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANT] _______________________________________________ Argument 1. Sergeant Stefan Castillo is a sergeant with the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department. Los Santos County Sheriff's Department is a law enforcement agency operating in Los Santos County. Sergeant Elise Crawford is a Sergeant with the Los Santos County Sheriff's Department, and head of it's Internal Affairs Division. 2. On the night of June 25th going into June 26th, Sergeant Castillo witnessed Deandre Lawrence chasing Franklin Mejora with a baseball bat. Lawrence then tackled Mejora, and began attacking him with aforementioned weapon. 3. At this point the threat to life was clear, and the victim testified to this fact. 4. Sergeant Castillo followed correct department protocol and fired once to save the life of the victim. He then asked the suspect to toss the weapon to the side. The suspect complied. 5. Sergeant Castillo then detained the suspect and administered aid while waiting for medics to arrive on scene. 6. Deputy Drake Hollow and Captain David Gunner transported the suspect, while Sergeant Castillo transported the victim. 7. Deputy Hollow and Captain Gunner did not follow appropriate internal protocols to question use of force, circumventing this crucial policy to go directly to IA. 8. IA ask Sergeant Castillo for a statement, which he provides voluntarily. 9. Sergeant Elise Crawford then says she has more questions for Sergeant Castillo. 10. He invokes his fifth amendment rights, refusing to answer more questions without recieving his Garrity rights, and being provided with representation and legal counsel. 11. Sergeant Crawford tries to put him on administrative leave and disarm him for refusing to answer these further questions. A clear violation of Garrity v. New Jersey. 12. The only reason he is not placed on leave at this point is because Sergeant Castillo reiterates his rights, and tells Sergeant Crawford if she wishes to disarm him she must do so herself. 13. Sergeant Castillo was unable to finish his arrest report and conclude his investigation with Mr Mejora. 14. After an interview taking place on the 26th of June, Sergeant Castillo was placed on adminstrative leave. 15. On the 30th of June his administrative leave was ended without explanation. Sergeant Crawford has refused to give a reason as to why the leave was both given, and ended. 16. Alongside monetary damages, the plantiff requests Sergeant Crawford's immediate termination, and his administrative leave to be expunged from his personnel record. Exhibits 1. An incident report affirming Sergeant Castillo was right to take the action he took (( Link to OOC Proof )) Witness List 1. Captain Guanti (( Link to Forum Profile )) _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 30th day of June, 2024 by: /s/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Ari Levy
-
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS COUNTY OF LOS SANTOS CIVIL DIVISION Case Name: Stefan Castillo v. Los Santos County Sheriff's Department Plaintiff Attorney: Ari Levy CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET _______________________________________________ 1. Check one box below that best describes this case: Personal Torts [ ] Assault, battery, or unlawful contact [ ] False imprisonment [ ] Intentional infliction of emotional distress [X] Deprivation of rights under color of law Negligent Torts [ ] Breach of duty [ ] Negligent infliction of emotional distress [ ] Professional or Medical Negligence Property Torts [ ] Trespassing or Conversion [ ] Nuisance [ ] Theft [ ] Detainder Dignitary Torts [ ] Defamation (Slander or Libel) [ ] Invasion of privacy [ ] Breach of confidence [ ] Abuse of process [ ] Malicious prosecution [ ] Alienation of affections Business Torts [ ] Fraud [ ] Tortious interference [ ] Conspiracy [ ] Restraint of trade [ ] Passing off Contracts [ ] Breach of Contract [ ] Collections Judicial Review [ ] Denial or Revocation of Business License [ ] Denial or Revocation of Firearms License 2. List any damages sustained or fees accrued. Include billing rate for attorneys, expert witnesses, etc. ~$240,000 in lost overtime wages $500,000 in emotional damages and distress $750,000 in attorney fees _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 30th day of June, 2024 by: /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Stefan Castillo Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Ari Levy Attorney for Plaintiff
-
George Dixon v. San Andreas Network
Levy, Bell & Weinstein replied to Levy, Bell & Weinstein's topic in Archive
The defense has been notified. -
George Dixon v. San Andreas Network
Levy, Bell & Weinstein replied to Levy, Bell & Weinstein's topic in Archive
Plaintiff v. Defendant Case Number: BCV24001 Prepared by: Ari Levy CIVIL CASE BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF _______________________________________________ Argument 1. San Andreas Network is a news agency operating in San Andreas, headquartered in Commerce, Los Santos. George Dixon is Associate Warden with the SADCR. 2. On the 21st of June 2024, Catherine Church, a journalist with this agency, released an article defaming Warden Dixon, claiming he "beat an inmate to within an inch of his life", and put his collegues life at risk. 3. She also talked about the Warden and this article during her show on the same date, interviewing a former inmate who likened Warden Dixon to President Nixon. 4. At no point were the Warden's accusations highlighted as anecdotal. They were presented as indisputed fact. 5. The Warden excercised appropriate physical force to restrain the inmate, and his collegues were not endanged beyond the level of risk expected and assumed in roles of their nature. 6. As a result of this defamation, Warden Dixon has sustained significant emotional distress, public backlash, and fears this libelous story may affect career prospects. Exhibits 1. Exhibit one is the article written by Miss Church, posted on the SAN website. (( Link to OOC Proof )) 2. Exhibit two is a disciplinary report for Ignacio Huerta, the aforementioned inmate, which explains the neccessary use of force. (( Link to OOC Proof )) Witness List 1. Alex Driver (( Link to Forum Profile )) _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 28th day of June, 2024 by: /s/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Ari Levy -
Levy, Bell & Weinstein
Levy, Bell & Weinstein replied to Levy, Bell & Weinstein's topic in Companies
LEVY, BELL & WEINSTEIN VICTORIOUS AGAINST LSPD DR COHEN PF LICENSE REINSTATED - DAMAGES AWARDED 27 JUNE 2024 Levy, Bell & Weinstein are proud to confirm that we have reached an out of court settlement with the Los Santos Police Department. Thanks to the tireless work of partners Naomi Shoshana Weinstein and Napoleon Bell, attorney Jason Madison, and our team of paralegals, we were able to build a strong and infallible case that left the department with no choice but to settle with us. Dr Derrick Cohen's PF license has been reinstated effective immediately and his criminal record has been expunged, allowing him to return to work at All Saints General Hospital. He will also recieved damages to compensate earnings lost during his suspension. Naomi Shoshana Weinstein had this to say: "I'm glad that our first case in San Andreas ended with a victory. We shall start as we mean to go on. I would like to thank the LSPD representative on this case, Sophie Thyne, for her co-operation and professionalism during proceedings. I'd also like to thank Dr Cohen for putting his trust in the firm. Our focus now is on our current caseload." LB&W currently have two other cases in front of the San Andreas Superior Court; another PF violation case for Vault Vanguard Transport, and a libel case for Mr George Dixon. If you would like to get in touch with the firm regarding legal counsel and representation please send an email to our team at [email protected] -
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS COUNTY OF LOS SANTOS CIVIL DIVISION Case Name: George Dixon v. San Andreas Network Plaintiff Attorney: Ari Levy CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET _______________________________________________ 1. Check one box below that best describes this case: Personal Torts [ ] Assault, battery, or unlawful contact [ ] False imprisonment [ ] Intentional infliction of emotional distress [ ] Deprivation of rights under color of law Negligent Torts [ ] Breach of duty [ ] Negligent infliction of emotional distress [ ] Professional or Medical Negligence Property Torts [ ] Trespassing or Conversion [ ] Nuisance [ ] Theft [ ] Detainder Dignitary Torts [X] Defamation (Slander or Libel) [ ] Invasion of privacy [ ] Breach of confidence [ ] Abuse of process [ ] Malicious prosecution [ ] Alienation of affections Business Torts [ ] Fraud [ ] Tortious interference [ ] Conspiracy [ ] Restraint of trade [ ] Passing off Contracts [ ] Breach of Contract [ ] Collections Judicial Review [ ] Denial or Revocation of Business License [ ] Denial or Revocation of Firearms License 2. List any damages sustained or fees accrued.Include billing rate for attorneys, expert witnesses, etc. $1,000,000 in attorney fees $250,000 in emotional damage and distress _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 22nd day of June, 2024 by: /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF George Dixon Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Ari Levy Attorney for Plaintiff
-
zaaru started following Levy, Bell & Weinstein
-
Derrick Cohen v. Los Santos Police Department
Levy, Bell & Weinstein replied to Levy, Bell & Weinstein's topic in Archive
((If it’s okay with the judge and with the LSPD representative we would like the court proceedings to take place at the courthouse in game at a time suitable for both parties)) -
Levy, Bell & Weinstein
Levy, Bell & Weinstein replied to Levy, Bell & Weinstein's topic in Companies
-
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS COUNTY OF LOS SANTOS CIVIL DIVISION Case Name: Derrick Cohen v. Los Santos Police Department Plaintiff Attorney: Naomi Weinstein CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET _______________________________________________ 1. Check one box below that best describes this case: Personal Torts [ ] Assault, battery, or unlawful contact [ ] False imprisonment [ ] Intentional infliction of emotional distress [ ] Deprivation of rights under color of law Negligent Torts [ ] Breach of duty [ ] Negligent infliction of emotional distress [ ] Professional or Medical Negligence Property Torts [ ] Trespassing or Conversion [ ] Nuisance [ ] Theft [ ] Detainder Dignitary Torts [ ] Defamation (Slander or Libel) [ ] Invasion of privacy [ ] Breach of confidence [ ] Abuse of process [ ] Malicious prosecution [ ] Alienation of affections Business Torts [ ] Fraud [ ] Tortious interference [ ] Conspiracy [ ] Restraint of trade [ ] Passing off Contracts [ ] Breach of Contract [ ] Collections Judicial Review [ ] Denial or Revocation of Business License [X] Denial or Revocation of Firearms License 2. List any damages sustained or fees accrued. Include billing rate for attorneys, expert witnesses, etc. $68,550 in lost earnings $500,000 in attorney fees _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 16th day of June, 2024 by: /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Derrick Cohen Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Naomi Weinstein Attorney for Plaintiff
-
SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN ANDREAS COUNTY OF LOS SANTOS CIVIL DIVISION Case Name: Eustace Horvat, Buck Sloan v. Los Santos County Sheriff's Department Plaintiff Attorney: Napoleon Bell CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET _______________________________________________ 1. Check one box below that best describes this case: Personal Torts [ ] Assault, battery, or unlawful contact [ ] False imprisonment [ ] Intentional infliction of emotional distress [ ] Deprivation of rights under color of law Negligent Torts [ ] Breach of duty [ ] Negligent infliction of emotional distress [ ] Professional or Medical Negligence Property Torts [ ] Trespassing or Conversion [ ] Nuisance [ ] Theft [ ] Detainder Dignitary Torts [ ] Defamation (Slander or Libel) [ ] Invasion of privacy [ ] Breach of confidence [ ] Abuse of process [ ] Malicious prosecution [ ] Alienation of affections Business Torts [ ] Fraud [ ] Tortious interference [ ] Conspiracy [ ] Restraint of trade [ ] Passing off Contracts [ ] Breach of Contract [ ] Collections Judicial Review [ ] Denial or Revocation of Business License [X] Denial or Revocation of Firearms License 2. List any damages sustained or fees accrued. Include billing rate for attorneys, expert witnesses, etc. ~$650,000 in lost earnings $1,000,000 in attorney fees _______________________________________________ Certification. The undersigned swears or affirms, under penalty of perjury, that the information contained herein is truthful to the best of his knowledge. Sworn this 16th day of June, 2024 by: /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Eustace Horvat Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF PLAINTIFF Buck Sloan Plaintiff /S/ NAME OF ATTORNEY Napoleon Bell Attorney for Plaintiff
-
Levy, Bell & Weinstein
Levy, Bell & Weinstein replied to Levy, Bell & Weinstein's topic in Companies
Eustace Horvat, Buck Sloan (Vault Vanguard Transport) v. Los Santos County Sheriff's Department - PF Violation Appeal George Dixon v. San Andreas Network - Libel Derrick Cohen v. Los Santos Police Department - SUCCESSFUL -
After 61 years of loyal service to the people of Jackson and Liberty City, Levy, Bell & Weinstein have finally opened up shop on the sunny shores of Los Santos. The Levy, Bell & Weinstein team are capable of handling any and all civil or criminal matters. Levy, Bell & Weinstein will take your case to the Court of Appeals and get your sentence thrown out by any means necessary. We believe you when you say the 3 kilos of cocaine they found on you was planted, or that the gun that killed a 7-year-old girl in a drive-by shooting gone wrong was only registered in your name due to a clerical error. Our crack team of shameless trial lawyers from the most prestigious and incestuous law schools in the country never let the truth get in the way of victory. If we can’t get the sentence overturned we’ll make sure it’s cut by as much time as possible, so you can get back out on the street doing the things that you love as soon as possible. If a law enforcement officer has acted improperly, we will help you bring them to justice. We'll make sure the LS City official who towed your car when you were illegally parked never sees the inside of a tow truck again. No evidence? No problem! Our freelancers in Mumbai, Sylhet, and Sierra Leone will work tirelessly to help produce all the audio and video material needed to build the case, and as long as their currencies stay weak we can offer these services at no additional cost! Your boss told you that you were fired for smoking pot while on duty and coming in late most of the time, we say you were fired due to an invisible disability that is protected under the Equal Employment Opportunity Act. We'll make sure you get paid in full, and get your employer cancelled in the process. Divorce settlements, custody battles, broken contracts, and the theft of intellectual property. These are the concepts on which Los Santos is built upon. All Levy, Bell and Weinstein lawyers have a lack of common decency, and will rain hell upon your enemies without relent. No case is too petty, no claim, too vindictive. Levy, Bell & Weinstein are also able to broker deals greater than $1,000,000 in value. This can include anything from company mergers and real estate to vintage vehicles and art. Do not cut corners or penny pinch if the deal is important to you, trying to save money by choosing a budget firm will only lead to more money spent down the line. Only LB&W can give you peace of mind. Levy, Bell and Weinstein are one of the only law firms in the world with a commitment to humanitarianism embedded in it’s foundations. The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr Fund is a ring-fenced budget dedicated to serving those of lesser means and from low-income households. Levy, Bell and Weinstein will represent you completely free of charge. Use of the fund is handled on a case-by-case basis to provide pro-bono work to selected eligible clients. Clients must have a case that is in alignment with the values of the fund, and must be able to prove their financial circumstances. ((Less than 100k in /stats)) If you believe you may be eligible for the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Fund, please inform us during your preliminary meeting. Levy built his reputation in The Exchange neighbourhood of Liberty City. His ruthlessness and shamelessness in deliberations of hostile takeovers and mergers made him a feared but admired litigator. This cuthroat and often reckless attiude earned him the nickname "King Solomon", a reference to the bible story where two mothers came to King Solomon both claiming to be the mother of a baby boy. King Solomon said that he would cut the baby in half and give each mother a piece. The false mother said she would accept this judgement, whereas the real one begged Solomon to spare the boy's life and just give him to the other mother. In this instance, the baby would be any company with a market cap over $500,000,000, and the real mother would be the ousted CEOs who accept Levy's insulting settlements. Levy is a partner, and head of the Corporate & Takeovers side of the firm. With all the charm of a Southern boy, and all the legal prowess of a Supreme Court Justice, Napoleon Bell is possibly the country's best courtroom performer. His ability to persuade judges and juries is unparalled. Despite his messy appearance, once he steps inside the courtroom he is as graceful as a ballerina. He has won all of his cases bar one, when he chose to represent himself in his divorce proceedings. His ex-wife, Belinda Bell, walked away with the lion's share of his hard-earned estate, leaving him with close to nothing. Napoleon Bell is a partner, and head of the Criminal & Appeals side of the firm. Naomi Shoshana Weinstein came to prominence as first chair in the Cloe Parker v. FIZZ! lawsuit. She saved the media company $18 million and subsequently became the darling child of right wing media companies across the country. Since then she has tried to reinvent her image and distance herself from the ghouls of the American fourth estate. Naomi Shoshana Weinstein is a partner, and head of the Civil & Suits side of the firm. Here at Levy, Bell & Weinstein we don’t believe a lengthy, rigid application form allows our applicants to really demonstrate how talented they are. If you’re interested in joining the team and serving the people of San Andreas send us a message outlining your experience, skills, and aspirations. We’ll organise an in-person interview with you at our office. All applicants should have, or should be prepared to, pass the San Andreas State Bar Exam. You can reach us at [email protected] If you want to reach out to please find our contact details below. Please note we are currently temporarily no longer taking new clients. Please also note we are closed on the Sabbath. Levy, Bell & Weinstein 2000 Central Street Commerce Los Santos San Andreas Corporate & Takeovers Department: 555-266-9853 Criminal & Appeals Department: 555-206-5170 Civil & Suits Department: 555-299-2211 Or send us an email at [email protected]
- 37 replies
-
- 10