Leaderboard

Congratulations to everybody that has been apart of this journey for the past (almost) 10 months and has contributed to our faction in one way or another. It's been one hell of a ride and we aren't done yet. Special thanks to @trickster @kosowarner @esk00 @Daidough @1x1 @LethalBruh and @ThePolterguise for contributing in their own way and making this faction what it is today.

Hey everyone, I just gotta get something off my chest - I am beyond proud to be a part of the Hell Runners Motorcycle Club, especially now that we're officially recognized in the LS-RP server. This is a major milestone for me personally, and for all of us who've been grinding away at this dream. It's no secret that LS-RP has seen its fair share of challenges lately, with a dwindling player base and all, but despite that, seeing our faction's name up there feels like a massive win. Huge props to every single person who believed in us from day one and kept pushing us forward, even when things looked bleak. Big shoutout to @danut for being the backbone of this god damn operation and to every member who stuck by our side through thick and thin. This is more than just a virtual achievement; it was my main fucking goal ever since I sent Danut a message way back in July 2023: So here's to us, the Hell Runners Motorcycle Club, and to many more adventures on the road ahead! Ride on, brothers. R F F R. Here's some content, enjoy!

Thanks for your question. Houses with existing owners from when the SAMP server shut, will still retain ownership of those houses. However once we open, those players and their assets will be subject to activity requirements (details TBC), meaning that any players who are inactive will at some point have their properties listed for auction, allowing other players the chance to buy them. The prison will be available at launch, yes, as SADCR.

Pleasure to work with you all

The boys are ba-- THEY NEVER LEFT HOMIE Congratz to the big bad red ♥

So we're back. It will take some time to set up all the systems again and getting the articles going again. We'll be looking at where we'll be putting our priorities concerning news. IG news, articles, etc. Hope to get it back going along with the playerbase and the SA-MP launch.

Stated between 4-6 weeks.

This is my brother

only gangsigns

куцам друже, године рађења радова за факс на ћирилици. додуше на телефону не могу да опепелим...

(( The organization associated with the Peckerwoods presents a portrayal of a reformed neo-Nazi group. It's crucial to clarify that this portrayal doesn't reflect our out-of-character beliefs in any way. We aim to depict a unique approach to the Peckerwood concept, more aligned with current times. Those interested can reach out to @Heliusdirectly on the forums or Discord. ))

Organized in the Melting Pot Hope I see yous in game

wait youre still here?

I sure hope not! I will defs make a vid if I got time, but still rather try make V content!

Bans will be shared. You'll have one account for LS-RP, which you can use for both RageMP and SAMP. As such the UCP will also be shared with separate sections for SAMP/RAGE-specific functionalities. Hope this clears it up for you.

Unlocked, welcome back @Yaffa

New registrations will be made on ucp.ls-rp.com — as we’ll be working off that UCP.

Catch ya later, buddy!

damn nice place

My homeless character is going to rob everyone to get some crack now

Me playing Strelinkovskaya Bratva's characters of course

All of the players who work to make LSRP better and all the players who enjoy LSRP and stay with the server no matter what are the legends

Gorgeous wish there were more bad guys!

mulțumesc

Legal Distance to Film Police Situations Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. When filming a police-involved situation, one may often pose the question of "how close can I stand to record?" Even if the journalist doesn't ask this question ahead of time, it's very likely that a law enforcement officer on-scene will ask it for you. You should be ready to distinguish between lawful orders and unlawful orders, to preserve your constitutional first amendment right to conduct journalism in a public place. Date: 2023 August 26th; Location: Forum Dr, Strawberry; Image Caption: Two Sheriff's Deputies stopped a green SUV in a routine traffic stop. Where do I stand? Absent police tape, you have the right to be present in any public place, as long as you aren't obstructing legal traffic. A law enforcement officer may likely accuse you of violating San Andreas Penal Code 610. Obstruction of Justice: This law clearly refers "[state employee's] duties" to mean legally-authorized conduct. The "[state employee's] duties" does NOT include emotionally-motivated orders, which violate journalist's right to be filming in a public place. Journalist's mere presence in the area, so long as it doesn't directly and physically obstruct the law enforcement officers from conducting lawful only duties, is not a violation of any law as per the first amendment right Freedom of Expression. Date: 2023 August 26th; Location: Forum Dr, Strawberry; Image Caption: Deputy Lanning of the Los Santos Sheriff's Department is asking the journalist to retreat from a public area. Below, I attached a sound-clip from a traffic-stop audit. In this recording, Deputy Lanning from the Los Santos Sheriff's Department issues an unlawful order for me to retreat further, when I was in no way physically obstructing them from conducting their duties: *Attached sound-file of Michelle Jefferson, Ryan Lanning and Garland Rigg's conversation: Cops can legally lie. Cops can be legally reasonably negligent. The court realizes that police officers are regular people, because they often work alongside one another. Therefore, the court allows law enforcement officers to make statements that are untruthful, such as when Deputy Lanning told me that telling me to retreat further was a "lawful order" when it was not. To counter this, one has two options: Option 1: Court The first is to just take it on the chin, comply with the unlawful order at the time, and sue the officer later for violating your constitutional rights, therefore stripping them of their qualified immunity and making them personally financially liable for any and all damages caused due to their violation of their oath to uphold the constitution. Option 2: Refuse The law clearly states that it only applies to actual lawful order, not "orders that the cop subjectively thinks are lawful at the time." This means that, technically, it's not illegal to resist unlawful orders. What are the risks of doing this? Well... death, injury and false imprisonment. But the reward? The officer is still directly financially liable for any and all damages caused, once they are stripped of their immunity in court for violating their oath to uphold the constitution. Of course, this doesn't help you much if you die - but, perhaps your family siblings can enjoy a world with one less corrupt law enforcement officer. The most likely risk of this is a false arrest, which will later on yield financial restitution through courts. If you have a firearms license, it will be suspended until you can prove your innocence in court. When interrogated by police, use your fifth amendment right to refuse to answer any and all questions. It's also possible that upon refusal, you will make the officer reflect on their mistake and realize that - indeed, they aren't making a lawful order, they made a mistake. Mistakes are fine, as long as you can admit that you make them. The problem starts when some officers, driven by emotion rather than their logic, decide to abuse their imminent authority to "prove a point." Summary Taking all we've spoken about, let's imagine a hypothetical scenario similar to the one you've witnessed here. You are journalizing a regular traffic stop, when a law enforcement officer comes along and orders you to move back where you can't film anymore. Even though you aren't directly physically obstructing anything. Moreover, they lie, intentionally or by accident, and claim that they have legal authority to order you to move back. Legally speaking, you have two options: comply with an unlawful order or refuse an unlawful order. The risks of refusing an unlawful order are purely physical, and all legal consequences as a false arrest are grounds for you to sue the city, and (because of a constitutional violation) the violating law enforcement officer directly for financial restitution and full compensation for all damages endures as a result of said false arrest. The risks of obeying an unlawful order is the continual slow erosion of everyone's constitutional rights. You choose.